Hardware support: (Extremetech) AMD Has Scaled Ryzen Faster Than Any Other CPU in the Past 20 Years |
- (Extremetech) AMD Has Scaled Ryzen Faster Than Any Other CPU in the Past 20 Years
- NVIDIA limits GeForce RTX 3090/3080 Founders Edition US sales to BestBuy - VideoCardz.com
- Confirmed by Microsoft: AMD Radeon RX 6000 Series Graphics supports AV1 decoding
- From a manufacturing point of view, what does the "maturing of a process" actually entail?
- Intel Rocket Lake-S PCIe 4.0 performance allegedly tested on Z490 motherboard
- Asus ROG Strix Gaming RTX 3090 Review, Thermals, Overclocking & Gaming Benchmarks
- With what we can extrapolate from the Zen 3 announcement yesterday. What can we expect from the Zen 3 Threadripper cpus?
- The NZXT N7 Z490 Motherboard Review: From A Different Direction
- The Acer Nitro 5 Review: Renoir And Turing On A Budget
- DOE Under Secretary for Science Dabbar’s Exascale Update: Frontier to Be First, Aurora to Be Monitored
(Extremetech) AMD Has Scaled Ryzen Faster Than Any Other CPU in the Past 20 Years Posted: 09 Oct 2020 07:14 AM PDT |
NVIDIA limits GeForce RTX 3090/3080 Founders Edition US sales to BestBuy - VideoCardz.com Posted: 09 Oct 2020 01:45 PM PDT |
Confirmed by Microsoft: AMD Radeon RX 6000 Series Graphics supports AV1 decoding Posted: 10 Oct 2020 01:56 AM PDT |
From a manufacturing point of view, what does the "maturing of a process" actually entail? Posted: 09 Oct 2020 01:57 PM PDT It's no secret that when a company like TSMC first move to a new manufacturing process, like 7nm, yields are relatively poor, prices high, and the potential performance of a given processor architecture developed on that process limited. However as time goes on, those yields are improved, costs come down, and the performance potential increases in the form of increased overclocking headroom. But what, exactly, does this "maturing" entail? It's obviously nothing automatic, like a wine that passively gets better with time. Something happens within the semiconductor company. Is it a change in the lithography machines, hardware changes & fine-tunings allowing for better precision in the lithography process, is it a greater understanding of said machines by their operators such that they're better able to extract more performant silicon out of them? I was spurred to ask this when listening to Buildzoid from Actually Hardcore Overclocking in a recent video, where he talks about his launch week Ryzen 7 3700X not being able to hit 4.1 GHz all core, but recently produced 3700X's hitting 4.4, 4.5, or even 4.6 GHz with cranked up voltages (in the context of his OC-centric, score-seeking world, I assume, not any long term stable day to day OC). That's a significant change on the same architecture, built on the same process using presumably the same machines. Any insight on the subject would be most welcome. Thank you. [link] [comments] |
Intel Rocket Lake-S PCIe 4.0 performance allegedly tested on Z490 motherboard Posted: 09 Oct 2020 06:37 AM PDT |
Asus ROG Strix Gaming RTX 3090 Review, Thermals, Overclocking & Gaming Benchmarks Posted: 09 Oct 2020 10:26 PM PDT |
Posted: 09 Oct 2020 08:25 AM PDT Like the Ryzen 5000, I expect TR to have the same IO die. However, with the new L3 design. What multicore performance can we expect? [link] [comments] |
The NZXT N7 Z490 Motherboard Review: From A Different Direction Posted: 09 Oct 2020 06:27 AM PDT |
The Acer Nitro 5 Review: Renoir And Turing On A Budget Posted: 09 Oct 2020 06:31 AM PDT |
Posted: 09 Oct 2020 05:16 AM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment