Hardware support: Unreleased Intel Core i5-12400F CPU could offer Ryzen 5 5600X performance at half the price, shows early review - VideoCardz.com

---

• Unreleased Intel Core i5-12400F CPU could offer Ryzen 5 5600X performance at half the price, shows early review - VideoCardz.com
• [der8auer] Up to 25% more Performance using DDR5? How Big is the Difference between DDR4 and DDR5 on Z690?
• List of Games Affected by DRM Issue in 12th Gen Intel® Core™ Processors for Windows 11 and Windows® 10
• Has anyone benchmarked Intel 12th gen's integrated graphics?
• [Anandtech] VIA To Offload Parts of x86 Subsidiary Centaur to Intel For $125 Million
• [igorsLab] Core i9-12900KF, Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600 in a workstation test with amazing results and an old weakness | Part 2
• GPD Pocket 3 - unboxing and first look at the 8 inch mini-laptop with modular ports
• Razer Pro Click Mini Review: A wireless mouse for power users
• Leaked Apple Silicon roadmap hints at new Mac Pro, MacBook Air
• What is the TECHNICAL reason behind Intel HD's notoriusly bad overall performance?
• Notebookcheck: "Unreleased AMD Ryzen 6000 processors already supported in Project Hydra overclocking utility"
• [STH] AMD's CEO Teases the OAM Accelerator Era on Twitter
• Countless benchmarks show that even an RTX 3090 is bottlenecking the CPU at 1080p. Why are reviewers benchmarking CPUs and DDR5 with games bottlenecked by GPUs even lower than a 3090?
• 9to5Google: "Google's Pixel foldable coming in 2022, cameras will be a step down from Pixel 6"

Unreleased Intel Core i5-12400F CPU could offer Ryzen 5 5600X performance at half the price, shows early review - VideoCardz.com Posted: 05 Nov 2021 11:13 AM PDT submitted by /u/RainyDay111 [link] [comments]

[der8auer] Up to 25% more Performance using DDR5? How Big is the Difference between DDR4 and DDR5 on Z690? Posted: 05 Nov 2021 08:40 AM PDT submitted by /u/InvincibleBird [link] [comments]

List of Games Affected by DRM Issue in 12th Gen Intel® Core™ Processors for Windows 11 and Windows® 10 Posted: 05 Nov 2021 11:15 AM PDT submitted by /u/RainyDay111 [link] [comments]

Has anyone benchmarked Intel 12th gen's integrated graphics? Posted: 05 Nov 2021 10:28 AM PDT All reviews I have seen so far: LTT, HUB, GN, etc. don't mention the integrated graphics performance at all. submitted by /u/DeliciousIncident [link] [comments]

[Anandtech] VIA To Offload Parts of x86 Subsidiary Centaur to Intel For $125 Million Posted: 05 Nov 2021 08:36 AM PDT submitted by /u/Nekrosmas [link] [comments]

[igorsLab] Core i9-12900KF, Core i7-12700K and Core i5-12600 in a workstation test with amazing results and an old weakness | Part 2 Posted: 05 Nov 2021 11:14 AM PDT submitted by /u/Put_It_All_On_Blck [link] [comments]

GPD Pocket 3 - unboxing and first look at the 8 inch mini-laptop with modular ports Posted: 05 Nov 2021 09:45 AM PDT submitted by /u/RodionRaskoljnikov [link] [comments]

Razer Pro Click Mini Review: A wireless mouse for power users Posted: 06 Nov 2021 02:07 AM PDT submitted by /u/a_Ninja_b0y [link] [comments]

Leaked Apple Silicon roadmap hints at new Mac Pro, MacBook Air Posted: 05 Nov 2021 07:24 AM PDT submitted by /u/blind_system [link] [comments]

What is the TECHNICAL reason behind Intel HD's notoriusly bad overall performance? Posted: 05 Nov 2021 05:04 PM PDT Title. As we all know, Intel HD(excluding Xe Chips such as Tiger Lake GT1/GT2 or Rocket Lake GT1) were really bad, despite having many users. I, for one, use it as an daily driver, and was interested to know the technical reasons on which made them bad. So far, looking at Skylake GT2's design, the lack of structures seemed like one of the definite factors, although I'm not sure enough to call that the "definite reason" as you can have feel structures with small IPC. Efficiency doesn't look so bad, imo. 1.05GHz with around 10-15w sounds pretty decent. I do realize Intel HD's have access to L3 Cache though, and Skylake CPUs(mobile ones) didn't have much of it either. I also understand that an more generalized cache(which both the CPU and iGPU can access) may be slower than an specialized one(as to why there were Skylake models with L4 eDRAM). By the way, how significant was L4 in bandwidth constrained scenarios? Die Size also seems like an issue to me, compared to dGPUs. Anyway, what would you guys like to share or correct me with? submitted by /u/Dranzule [link] [comments]

Notebookcheck: "Unreleased AMD Ryzen 6000 processors already supported in Project Hydra overclocking utility" Posted: 05 Nov 2021 08:49 AM PDT submitted by /u/imaginary_num6er [link] [comments]

[STH] AMD's CEO Teases the OAM Accelerator Era on Twitter Posted: 06 Nov 2021 12:18 AM PDT submitted by /u/cum_hoc [link] [comments]

Countless benchmarks show that even an RTX 3090 is bottlenecking the CPU at 1080p. Why are reviewers benchmarking CPUs and DDR5 with games bottlenecked by GPUs even lower than a 3090? Posted: 05 Nov 2021 09:36 AM PDT When comparing CPU's you want to compare workloads where the CPU is the bottleneck. When increasing the resolution of games to something like 1080p, you move the bottleneck to the GPU instead - you are in effect benchmarking the GPU instead of benchmarking the CPU. [Google] ample proof that modern games are GPU bottlenecked at 1080p even at the GPU top end: https://flipfigures.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/rtx-3090-1080p-gaming-fps-benchmarks-flipfigures.com_-1024x573.png der8auer used a 3080 Ti. Kitguru used a 3080. Anandtech used a 2080 Ti. Every single one of these cards are the bottleneck at 1080p. A card does not exist which is NOT a bottleneck at 1080p. Every reviewer: "Oh noes, DDR5 and DDR4 are about the same performance when I only test at GPU limited scenarios" - Queue Surprised Pikachu face... "Oh, there is a much bigger difference in productivity where GPUs are not used" - Queue Surprised Pikachu face... I'm not saying that there will be a huge difference, but all CPU benchmarks (which includes memory benchmarks) should be benchmarked at 720p max to try to replicate a scenario with infinitely powerful GPU as an experimental control. **720p and lower tests will perfectly show how your system will perform years down the line with an RTX 4080/5080/6080 with games designed for next-next-gen consoles.** It's literally like testing the top speed of a super car by driving it on a road limiting it to 70mph, and then claiming "My Skoda goes as fast as this Lamborghini because no road will let you go faster than 70! <-- Do you see how ridiculous this sounds? Another poignant example: You could try benchmarking a **super powerful intel 16900K from the year 2035, and it would still benchmark showing similar numbers as current gen CPUs** because it is being bottlenecked by the GPU. Current results from these so-called "reviewers" are meaningless because what they are doing is effectively benchmarking their test system GPU - not the CPU as intended. So far, Computerbase.de is the only one which has 720p benchies from what I can tell. Kudos to them. This is mildly infuriating. Thanks. ------ In before "dur hur no-one plays games at 720p" smh. submitted by /u/MakeItSo_Number1 [link] [comments]

9to5Google: "Google's Pixel foldable coming in 2022, cameras will be a step down from Pixel 6" Posted: 05 Nov 2021 06:25 AM PDT submitted by /u/Dakhil [link] [comments]

You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States