Hardware support: NAND inventor’s company invents Dynamic Flash Memory – a theoretical DRAM replacement |
- NAND inventor’s company invents Dynamic Flash Memory – a theoretical DRAM replacement
- Dolphin Emulator - Temptation of the Apple: Dolphin on macOS M1
- Intel’s 7nm “Meteor Lake” compute tile has taped in
- Anandtech: "Qualcomm Shows Off Snapdragon Dev Kit for Windows on Arm Development"
- How much progress can mobile GPUs make in the next 5-10 years?
- Read a paper: CPUs without Clocks
- Arctic has released RGB and ARGB versions of the Liquid Freezer II
- Anandtech: "Qualcomm Announces Snapdragon 7c Gen 2: Entry-Level PC and Chromebook Refresh"
- What happened to Intel's NGC arch?
- BenQ EX3415R - 144Hz of IPS Awesome - Quick Testing & Color Profile Info
- [IgorsLab] Intel’s Alder Lake-S with boxed cooler and Cryo Cooler including Peltier element - Exclusive details and preview
- Why different thermal throttling limits for Intel vs AMD CPUs? How does it affect their Lifespan? [repost]
- SOLVED by 1440p HiDPI: MacBook Pro 16" is HOT & NOISY with an external monitor
NAND inventor’s company invents Dynamic Flash Memory – a theoretical DRAM replacement Posted: 24 May 2021 12:01 PM PDT |
Dolphin Emulator - Temptation of the Apple: Dolphin on macOS M1 Posted: 24 May 2021 06:04 AM PDT |
Intel’s 7nm “Meteor Lake” compute tile has taped in Posted: 24 May 2021 09:37 AM PDT |
Anandtech: "Qualcomm Shows Off Snapdragon Dev Kit for Windows on Arm Development" Posted: 24 May 2021 08:03 AM PDT |
How much progress can mobile GPUs make in the next 5-10 years? Posted: 24 May 2021 12:39 PM PDT The GPU in the Galaxy S1 from 2010 had about 3-4 gigaflops. In comparison, the Galaxy S21 now has over 1Teraflop. Thats an enourmous progress I never was aware of. I alaways had the impression that mobile GPUs only got about 20% stronger per year, but they actually got multiple times stronger every year. Now we have Smartphones with over a teraflop. How much growth can there be in the next years? Will we see Smartphones with 2, 3 or even 10 teraflops by 2025? [link] [comments] |
Read a paper: CPUs without Clocks Posted: 24 May 2021 09:01 AM PDT |
Arctic has released RGB and ARGB versions of the Liquid Freezer II Posted: 24 May 2021 05:42 PM PDT I had a link show up in Google news a day ago and the link redirected to Arctic's website, but the page was down. Tried to google it and found it listed on Amazon though. Doesnt have the thicker Bionic P120 ARGB fans from the looks of it. [link] [comments] |
Anandtech: "Qualcomm Announces Snapdragon 7c Gen 2: Entry-Level PC and Chromebook Refresh" Posted: 24 May 2021 08:08 AM PDT |
What happened to Intel's NGC arch? Posted: 25 May 2021 01:41 AM PDT Few years ago (2016/2017) there were big news that Intel is starting work on their new architecture - Next-Gen Core (NGC). However since then we didn't really have any information on this topic. Last that is possible to find is info from Jim Keller in 2020 that after NGC release he wants to change cycle for arch redesign from every 10 years to redesign every 5 years... and that's all. NGC was supposed to be ready by 2021/2022 and release alongside Intel's 7nm. When AMD was working on Zen we had bits of information dropped every now and then, AMD officially announced it 2 years before original Zen CPUs released. So is Intel that good at keeping any information from leaking or are they that far from actually finishing work on NGC? Are there any information on NGC that I somehow missed? [link] [comments] |
BenQ EX3415R - 144Hz of IPS Awesome - Quick Testing & Color Profile Info Posted: 24 May 2021 02:54 PM PDT |
Posted: 24 May 2021 03:53 AM PDT |
Posted: 24 May 2021 05:33 AM PDT Repost: Deleted the previous post by mistake. Apologies. Let's pick laptop CPUs: Intel 11800H and AMD 5800H. Intel uses a 10nm node which is kind of equivalent (I could be wrong) to the 7nm node used by AMD, so I think this could be a fair comparison (based on transistor densities). The Intel CPU throttles at 95C while the AMD is set to throttle at 105C (this is based on a few reviews and info on websites, for example, this and this). Can one make a certain (any) type of comment on the quality (in terms of lifespan and endurance) when just looking at these throttling limits alone? Is the AMD hardware more robust and can endure more heat before it finally breaks down? Could this mean that even when running the AMD at a higher average temperature (let's say around 95C), its lifetime would be similar to that of Intel's running at a lower average temperature (let say around 85C)? If true, this would also suggest that lifetime and endurance depend on temps relative to their respective throttling limits rather than the absolute temps. If that is not the case since both of them (should) have the same underlying semiconductor materials, and temperature should affect their lifespan and endurance equally, then wouldn't it be bad for AMD since they are not throttling the temps at 95C (like Intel does) and hence may have poorer lifetime than Intel CPUs? It would be really helpful if someone could explain these questions or point me to a discussion that is similar (since I couldn't really find one). Note: I don't understand the difference b/w the Junction temp on Intel's website which says 100C vs the actual throttling temp which can be seen in a benchmark video that I have linked. AMD's website says Max temp is 105C which I assumed to be the throttling temp since it does go over 100C (as seen in the other source). [link] [comments] |
SOLVED by 1440p HiDPI: MacBook Pro 16" is HOT & NOISY with an external monitor Posted: 24 May 2021 06:50 AM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment