Hardware support: AMD Ryzen: Gain of every Zen generation on application and gaming performance

---

• AMD Ryzen: Gain of every Zen generation on application and gaming performance
• AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Performance Summary: Benchmark results of 14 launch reviews compiled
• [VideoCardz] AMD mobile APUs for 2021-2022 detailed, first Navi2 iGPU coming with VanGogh?
• [Hardware Canucks] The Best Memory for AMD Ryzen - A Beginner's Guide to RAM Performance
• [VideoCardz] AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX spotted with 4.7 GHz boost clock, much faster than Ryzen 9 4900HS
• [VideoCardz] Intel 11th Gen Core series to feature Rocket Lake-S and Comet Lake-S Refresh CPUs
• [Hardware Unboxed] Asus PG329Q Review, The Very Fast 32-Inch 1440p Gaming Monitor To Get
• [AHOC] Responding to comments from the Gamers Nexus AM4 motherboard round up
• Laptop CPU battle: Apple M1 vs. Intel 11th-gen Core vs. AMD Ryzen 4000
• Will AMD and Intel ever move away from x86?
• Why ARM? Why Now?

AMD Ryzen: Gain of every Zen generation on application and gaming performance Posted: 19 Dec 2020 08:52 PM PST Golem tested 8-core models Ryzen 7 1800X, 2700X, 3800X and 5800X with 7 application and 7 games (at FullHD resolution) ...   Hardware Apps Gen→Gen Gaming (avg fps) Gaming (1% perc.) Gen→Gen Ryzen 7 5800X Zen 3, 8C/16T, 3.8/4.7 GHz 189.0% +27% 175.7% 184.2% +25% Ryzen 7 3800X Zen 2, 8C/16T, 3.8/4.4 GHz 148.4% +28% 141.5% 147.6% +20% Ryzen 7 2700X Zen+, 8C/16T, 3.7/4.35 GHz 116.1% +16% 119.7% 123.1% +23% Ryzen 7 1800X Zen, 8C/16T, 3.6/4.1 GHz 100% - 100% 100%   Sources: 3DCenter.org, based on benchmarks by Golem submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi [link] [comments]

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Performance Summary: Benchmark results of 14 launch reviews compiled Posted: 19 Dec 2020 09:25 PM PST compilation of 14 launch reviews with ~4550 gaming benchmarks at all resolutions only benchmarks under real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks geometric mean in all cases stock performance on reference/FE boards, no overclocking, no SAM, no Rage standard performance without RayTracing, extra RayTracing benchmarks at 4K resolution performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks for the full results check 3DCenter's launch analysis   1080Ti 2080Ti 3060Ti 3070 3080 3090 6800 6800XT 6900XT Gen & Mem Pascal 11GB Turing 11GB Ampere 8GB Ampere 8GB Ampere 10GB Ampere 24GB RDNA2 16GB RDNA2 16GB RDNA2 16GB average FullHD performance 61.5% 81.6% 73.3% 81.8% 98.0% 104.2% 84.6% 94.5% 100% average WQHD performance 55.6% 77.0% 67.9% 77.2% 97.2% 106.2% 82.0% 93.9% 100% average 4K performance 52.0% 74.8% 64.1% 74.0% 98.7% 110.9% 80.1% 92.5% 100% average RT@4K performance - 93.6% 79.5% 91.8% 128.6% 147.5% 79.0% 92.6% 100% MSRP $699 $1199 $399 $499 $699 $1499 $579 $649 $999 TDP 250W 260W 200W 220W 320W 350W 250W 300W 300W real Power Draw 238W 272W 202W 220W 327W 360W 231W 296W 305W Energy efficiency @4K 67% 84% 97% 103% 92% 94% 106% 95% 100% Price-performance ratio @ 4K 74% 62% 160% 148% 141% 74% 138% 142% 100%   EE = energy efficiency (calculated with 4K performance) PPR = price-performance ratio (calculated on MSRP) Gain of Radeon RX 6900 XT   FullHD     WQHD      4K      RT@4K     EE@4K     PPR@4K   6900XT vs Radeon RX 6800 XT +6% +6% +8% +8% +5% -30% 6900XT vs Radeon RX 6800 +18% +22% +25% +27% -5% -28% 6900XT vs GeForce RTX 3090 -4% -6% -10% -32% +6% +35% 6900XT vs GeForce RTX 3080 +2% +3% +1% -22% +9% -29% 6900XT vs GeForce RTX 3070 +22% +30% +35% +9% -3% -33% 6900XT vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti +36% +47% +56% +26% +3% -38% 6900XT vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti +23% +30% +34% +7% +19% +60% 6900XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti +63% +80% +92% - +50% +35%   Source: 3DCenter.org submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi [link] [comments]

[VideoCardz] AMD mobile APUs for 2021-2022 detailed, first Navi2 iGPU coming with VanGogh? Posted: 19 Dec 2020 07:20 AM PST submitted by /u/ryandtw [link] [comments]

[Hardware Canucks] The Best Memory for AMD Ryzen - A Beginner's Guide to RAM Performance Posted: 19 Dec 2020 11:38 AM PST submitted by /u/marxr87 [link] [comments]

[VideoCardz] AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX spotted with 4.7 GHz boost clock, much faster than Ryzen 9 4900HS Posted: 19 Dec 2020 07:18 AM PST submitted by /u/ryandtw [link] [comments]

[VideoCardz] Intel 11th Gen Core series to feature Rocket Lake-S and Comet Lake-S Refresh CPUs Posted: 19 Dec 2020 07:19 AM PST submitted by /u/ryandtw [link] [comments]

[Hardware Unboxed] Asus PG329Q Review, The Very Fast 32-Inch 1440p Gaming Monitor To Get Posted: 19 Dec 2020 07:12 AM PST submitted by /u/ryandtw [link] [comments]

[AHOC] Responding to comments from the Gamers Nexus AM4 motherboard round up Posted: 19 Dec 2020 09:13 AM PST submitted by /u/maybeslightlyoff [link] [comments]

Laptop CPU battle: Apple M1 vs. Intel 11th-gen Core vs. AMD Ryzen 4000 Posted: 19 Dec 2020 04:53 PM PST submitted by /u/jdrch [link] [comments]

Will AMD and Intel ever move away from x86? Posted: 19 Dec 2020 02:38 PM PST Basically the title, but with Apple moving to Arm the internet seems to be ready to jump ship from x86. I know Intel has the rights to the x86 instruction set, but is anything stopping them from making Arm (or RiscV or anything else) CPUs? AMD as well submitted by /u/Mcpower03 [link] [comments]

Why ARM? Why Now? Posted: 19 Dec 2020 05:51 AM PST ARM has been around for ...uh? Longer than most of us have been alive. No one ever cared about it. Almost no one used it. Then slowly RISC CPUs started cropping up in phones. Then nowhere else. Now all of a sudden everyone and their cousin wants to make a RISC CPU. Even AMD is thinking of getting in on this act. So my question is, what the hell? Why did it take like 50+ years for these things to catch on? submitted by /u/pzyk0tik [link] [comments]

You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States