Hardware support: Patent (Intel): "Three-Dimensional Nanoribbon-Based Static Random-Access Memory" |
- Patent (Intel): "Three-Dimensional Nanoribbon-Based Static Random-Access Memory"
- Reuters: Kioxia favours IPO over Western Digital merger offer-paper
- ELI5: Why does it seem like Cinebench is now the standard benchmark for CPUs?
- Question Regarding Newer Chips vs Older Chips
- Lian Li offers to replace models of Uni fan SL120 produced between December 2020 and March 2021 due to a defective blue LED IC.
| Patent (Intel): "Three-Dimensional Nanoribbon-Based Static Random-Access Memory" Posted: 05 Sep 2021 10:52 AM PDT |
| Reuters: Kioxia favours IPO over Western Digital merger offer-paper Posted: 05 Sep 2021 08:32 AM PDT |
| ELI5: Why does it seem like Cinebench is now the standard benchmark for CPUs? Posted: 05 Sep 2021 10:59 PM PDT I noticed that its results generally don't correlate with other benchmarks and it's a benchmark for a relatively niche software. Why does it seem like it's the standard for CPU benchmarks now? For example, Cinebench simply does not correlate with gaming performance: https://i.imgur.com/AaisARp.png In addition, Cinebench's 1t results does not correlate with 1t results from SPEC, Geekbench, Excel, gaming, etc. It's actually pretty hard to find another application that share the same 1t results with Cinebench. People seem to hate Geekbench 5 here. However, Geekbench 5 is highly correlated with SPEC based on research done by the chip design team at Nuvia. Just based on pure logic, shouldn't Geekbench5 be a better CPU benchmark than Cinebench because SPEC is the standard in CPU benchmarking? Nuvia's Geekbench5/SPEC research: https://medium.com/silicon-reimagined/performance-delivered-a-new-way-part-2-geekbench-versus-spec-4ddac45dcf03 [link] [comments] |
| Question Regarding Newer Chips vs Older Chips Posted: 05 Sep 2021 03:15 PM PDT Lets say a company wanted to build an Exaflop supercomputer.Putting aside cost differences and physical size, is there any difference in terms of overall functionality with a Supercomputer with say 10,000 new chips vs a Supercomputer with 100,000 older chips assuming both Supercomputers comptuers have the same overall processing power(i.e. the new chips are 10 times more powerful). In other words, is there something inherently better building a Supercomputer with more powerful chips even if overall processing power is the same? [link] [comments] |
| Posted: 05 Sep 2021 11:08 PM PDT |
| You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment