Hardware support: TechTechPotato (Dr Ian Cutress): "How Big is Too Big? Samsung now has 512 GB DDR5-7200!" |
- TechTechPotato (Dr Ian Cutress): "How Big is Too Big? Samsung now has 512 GB DDR5-7200!"
- VideoCardz: "AMD 3D V-Cache uses 9 micron pitch bonds, the future of 3D stacking is circuit slicing"
- (AMD Genoa) Details on the Gigabyte Leak
- Intel’s new companion chip for cloud providers has Arm inside
- [VideoCardz] Samsung plans 8-stacked TSV DDR5 memory modules with up to 512GB total capacity
- which architecture would scale better! reviewing PS2 and PS1 hardware
- Potential leak of the Asus-Noctua 3070
| TechTechPotato (Dr Ian Cutress): "How Big is Too Big? Samsung now has 512 GB DDR5-7200!" Posted: 22 Aug 2021 12:58 PM PDT |
| VideoCardz: "AMD 3D V-Cache uses 9 micron pitch bonds, the future of 3D stacking is circuit slicing" Posted: 22 Aug 2021 10:50 AM PDT |
| (AMD Genoa) Details on the Gigabyte Leak Posted: 22 Aug 2021 09:50 PM PDT |
| Intel’s new companion chip for cloud providers has Arm inside Posted: 22 Aug 2021 07:57 AM PDT |
| [VideoCardz] Samsung plans 8-stacked TSV DDR5 memory modules with up to 512GB total capacity Posted: 22 Aug 2021 08:17 AM PDT |
| which architecture would scale better! reviewing PS2 and PS1 hardware Posted: 22 Aug 2021 04:52 PM PDT both systems are largely heavily focused on graphics processing, the PS3 and PS2 both have a singular CPU core, the PS2 being a MIPS III with SIMD capabilities (so it has more parallel function than a typical CPU). and the PS3 CPU had a two thread PPE in both cases these are the closest you can get to a general purpose CPU the general purpose processing ends here, the PS2 CPU has two VPUs which do all of the vector and transformation and vertex operations are done by this not the GPU. and the PS3 has 6 SPEs which are like shader core clusters with more independent capability each has their own memory controller and cache the PS2 GPU is a bit more interesting it has fixed function pixel pipelines that do raster operations in order like texture mapping and pre processing and it has 16 of those and they have a gigantic 2560 bus that connects with its own DRAM. the PS3 CPU is largely uninteresting because its a slightly modified 7800GTX which of these two designs do you think scale better with modern technology and nodes and obviously updates?. the PS2 looks so efficient considering the low clock speeds it ran at yet the gaming performance was adequate and it's an insanely parallel machine. the Cell processor only did something similar on the CPU side but there were large bottlenecks with memory compared to the huge bandwidth the PS2 had relative to its performance. the PS2 had about 48 GBPS of total bandwidth to the buffers and additional 3.2 to the RDRAM, PS3 Cell/RSX had a read bandwidth of 68 GBPS and a write bandwidth of 48.4 GBPS [link] [comments] |
| Potential leak of the Asus-Noctua 3070 Posted: 22 Aug 2021 03:24 PM PDT https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/p9jbp3/can_anyone_identify_this_gpu/ Someone found this card at their work. The card pictures may be a potential model of the Asus-Noctua 3070 engineering sample or otherwise. Looking further into their account we may find: https://www.reddit.com/r/de_EDV/comments/p9jeii/kennt_jemand_diese_grafikkarte/ The OP posted this in German as well, so I'd assume they're from Germany or Austria. Here is their account: [link] [comments] |
| You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment