| Researchers Disclose Meltdown-like Vulnerability for AMD Zen+ and Zen 2 Processors Posted: 30 Aug 2021 05:02 PM PDT |
| New AMD Patent Proposes Teleportation to Make Quantum Computing More Efficient Posted: 30 Aug 2021 05:06 PM PDT |
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Meta Review: 8 reviews & 1990 benchmarks compiled Posted: 30 Aug 2021 02:23 AM PDT - compilation of 8 launch reviews with ~1990 gaming benchmarks at all resolutions
- only benchmarks at real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks
- geometric mean in all cases
- only launch reviews with complete adoption of rBAR & SAM were evaluated
- standard performance without ray-tracing and/or DLSS/FSR, extra ray-tracing benchmarks at 1080p resolution
- stock performance on (usual) reference/FE boards, no overclocking
- factory overclocked cards used: 3060 on Igor's, 6600XT on GameStar, Igor's, Le Comptoir & Tweakers, 6700XT on GameStar
- factory overclocked cards normalized to reference clocks/performance, but just for the overall performance average
- performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks
- power consumption for the GPU only, no system power draw
- for the full results and some more explanations check 3DCenter's launch analysis
| 1080p perf. | Tests | 2060 | 2060S | 2070S | 3060 | 3060Ti | 5700 | 5700XT | 6600XT | 6700XT | | Gen & Mem | | Turing 6GB | Turing 8GB | Turing 8GB | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | | ComputerB | (17) | 71.2% | 82.6% | 97.1% | 88.6% | 117.6% | 84.4% | 93.8% | 100% | 122.9% | | GameStar | (6) | - | - | 93.4% | 87.6% | 107.3% | - | - | 100% | 120.3% | | Golem | (7) | - | - | - | 91.2% | 113.5% | - | 97.0% | 100% | 126.0% | | Igor's | (7) | - | - | 94.8% | 88.2% | 109.5% | - | 91.2% | 100% | 120.4% | | Le Comptoir | (14) | - | 85.7% | - | 88.7% | 116.0% | 81.2% | 92.6% | 100% | 122.8% | | PCGH | (19) | ~73% | - | ~99% | 89.4% | ~115% | - | ~97% | 100% | 125.4% | | TechPowerUp | (22) | 74.5% | 83.7% | 96.9% | 89.8% | 114.3% | 84.7% | 93.9% | 100% | 118.4% | | Tweakers | (10) | 76.5% | - | - | 90.8% | 112.6% | 79.5% | 95.2% | 100% | 123.9% | | avg. 1080p performance | | 73.7% | 83.9% | 97.9% | 89.9% | 115.0% | 84.1% | 94.7% | 100% | 122.8% | | TDP | | 160W | 175W | 215W | 170W | 200W | 180W | 225W | 160W | 230W | | MSRP | | $299 | $399 | $499 | $329 | $399 | $349 | $399 | $379 | $479 | | 1440p perf. | Tests | 2060 | 2060S | 2070S | 3060 | 3060Ti | 5700 | 5700XT | 6600XT | 6700XT | | Gen & Mem | | Turing 6GB | Turing 8GB | Turing 8GB | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | | ComputerB | (17) | 73.5% | 86.5% | 101.6% | 92.4% | 123.9% | 87.3% | 97.6% | 100% | 128.6% | | GameStar | (6) | - | - | 97.9% | 91.3% | 116.1% | - | - | 100% | 124.0% | | Golem | (7) | - | - | - | 96.3% | 120.7% | - | 99.5% | 100% | 130.7% | | Igor's | (7) | - | - | 100.2% | 93.1% | 118.5% | - | 95.8% | 100% | 128.6% | | Le Comptoir | (14) | - | 88.5% | - | 92.2% | 123.2% | 83.2% | 94.7% | 100% | 128.6% | | PCGH | (19) | ~74% | - | ~106% | 94.4% | ~123% | - | ~101% | 100% | 131.6% | | TechPowerUp | (22) | 77.3% | 87.6% | 102.1% | 93.8% | 122.7% | 87.6% | 96.9% | 100% | 127.8% | | Tweakers | (10) | 76.0% | - | - | 94.7% | 120.6% | 84.3% | 99.1% | 100% | 127.3% | | avg. 1440p performance | | 75.6% | 87.6% | 103.1% | 94.2% | 123.1% | 87.3% | 98.3% | 100% | 129.5% | | TDP | | 160W | 175W | 215W | 170W | 200W | 180W | 225W | 160W | 230W | | MSRP | | $299 | $399 | $499 | $329 | $399 | $349 | $399 | $379 | $479 | | 2160p perf. | Tests | 2060 | 2060S | 2070S | 3060 | 3060Ti | 5700 | 5700XT | 6600XT | 6700XT | | Gen & Mem | | Turing 6GB | Turing 8GB | Turing 8GB | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | | GameStar | (6) | - | - | 109.6% | 104.2% | 133.3% | - | - | 100% | 133.7% | | Golem | (7) | - | - | - | 105.5% | 131.8% | - | 103.8% | 100% | 136.1% | | PCGH | (19) | ~80% | - | ~114% | 103.3% | ~134% | - | ~105% | 100% | 140.1% | | TechPowerUp | (22) | 84.5% | 97.9% | 116.5% | 104.1% | 140.2% | 96.9% | 107.2% | 100% | 141.2% | | avg. 2160p performance | | - | - | ~114% | ~104% | ~137% | - | ~105% | ~100% | ~139% | | TDP | | 160W | 175W | 215W | 170W | 200W | 180W | 225W | 160W | 230W | | MSRP | | $299 | $399 | $499 | $329 | $399 | $349 | $399 | $379 | $479 | | RT perf. @1080p | Tests | 2060 | 2060S | 2070S | 3060 | 3060Ti | 6600XT | 6700XT | | Gen & Mem | | Turing 6GB | Turing 8GB | Turing 8GB | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | RDNA2 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | | ComputerB | (5) | 93.1% | 119.8% | 140.3% | 132.7% | 173.0% | 100% | 136.3% | | Le Comptoir | (12) | - | 155.0% | - | 174.9% | 229.9% | 100% | 171.2% | | PCGH | (10) | - | - | 168.5% | 152.9% | - | 100% | 153.8% | | TechPowerUp | (3) | 94.9% | 108.4% | 126.0% | 124.1% | 162.9% | 100% | 131.5% | | Tweakers | (3) | 84.4% | - | - | 108.3% | 138.2% | 100% | 122.6% | | avg. ray-tracing performance | | - | ~135% | ~161% | ~150% | ~197% | ~100% | ~153% | | TDP | | 160W | 175W | 215W | 170W | 200W | 160W | 230W | | MSRP | | $299 | $399 | $499 | $329 | $399 | $379 | $479 | | Power Consumption | 3060 | 3060Ti | 3070 | 6600XT | 6700XT | | Gen & Mem | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 8GB | RDNA2 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | | ComputerBase | 172W | 200W | 220W | 147W | 215W | | Golem | - | 200W | 221W | 152W | 231W | | Guru3D | 175W | 224W | 208W | 165W | 217W | | Hardwareluxx | 189W | 209W | 221W | 215W | 260W | | Igor's Lab | 170W | 198W | 217W | 163W | 217W | | Le Comptoir d.H. | 175W | 201W | 227W | 172W | 227W | | Les Numeriques | 162W | 208W | 232W | - | 222W | | PC Games Hardware | 171W | 202W | 221W | 155W | 218W | | TechPowerUp | 177W | 199W | 220W | 166W | 221W | | Tweakers | 172W | 195W | 207W | 158W | 215W | | avg power consumption | 171W | 201W | 221W | 156W | 220W | | TDP | 170W | 200W | 220W | 160W | 230W | | Power limit | 170W (card) | 200W (card) | 220W (card) | 130W (ASIC) | 186W (ASIC) | | At a glance | 3060 | 6600XT | 3060Ti | | 1080p performance | 100% | 111.3% | 128.0% | | 1440p performance | 100% | 106.2% | 130.7% | | 2160p performance | ~100% | ~97% | ~132% | | RT perf. (1080p) | ~100% | ~66% | ~131% | | Power consumption | 171W | 156W | 201W | | MSRP | $329 | $379 | $399 | Note: There were a lot of launch reviews for the Radeon RX 6600 XT (around 60), but in the end only 8 of them could be evaluated - because only those proved a current system (with rBAR/SAM for all cards) including current drivers (for all cards, not just the 6600XT). This is not only about the rBAR/SAM feature, but also about the partial use of old benchmark values, which were still set up with 2020 drivers. This is simply a no-go in terms of accuracy and the exact recording of the correct performance differences. Some hardware testers should finally make a move to replace old test configurations with updated ones. Source: 3DCenter.org submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi [link] [comments] |
| GIGABYTE AORUS Gen4 7000s SSD Unlocks PS5 Extensions Posted: 30 Aug 2021 09:56 AM PDT |
| Multi-chip Intel Core i9-11900K Overclocking Review: Four Boards, Cryo Cooling Posted: 30 Aug 2021 09:09 AM PDT |
| Where is the FPS/Watt sweet spot in graphics cards? Posted: 31 Aug 2021 02:46 AM PDT I saw that the 3070TI has a much higher power draw than the 3070 and it barely had better fps... Would a 3070TI perform like a 3070 if I put the power settings to match the 3070 in afterburner? I noticed my 1080 running much quieter and having barely any fps drop on -15% to -20% power submitted by /u/nofakeaccount2244 [link] [comments] |
| ASRock and NZXT Intel Z690, H670, B660 and H610 motherboards listed - VideoCardz.com Posted: 30 Aug 2021 05:54 AM PDT |
| TechTechPotato (Dr Ian Cutress): "Moving a 5nm Fab: 'No Comment', says TSMC" Posted: 30 Aug 2021 05:58 AM PDT |
| New rx 6900 xtx to compete against 3090 super Posted: 30 Aug 2021 11:39 PM PDT |
No comments:
Post a Comment