• Breaking News

    Friday, June 18, 2021

    Hardware support: Team Group Steps into the New DDR5 Era, Launches Team Elite DDR5 DIMM | $399.99 for 2x16GB DDR5-4800

    Hardware support: Team Group Steps into the New DDR5 Era, Launches Team Elite DDR5 DIMM | $399.99 for 2x16GB DDR5-4800


    Team Group Steps into the New DDR5 Era, Launches Team Elite DDR5 DIMM | $399.99 for 2x16GB DDR5-4800

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 05:23 AM PDT

    [Hardware Unboxed] Are GPUs Finally Getting Cheaper? GPU Stock and Pricing Update [June 2021]

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 04:05 AM PDT

    [Gamers Nexus] AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU Review & Benchmarks: $260 CPU + GPU (vs. 5600X & More)

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 05:08 PM PDT

    [VideoCardz] Intel DG2 set to compete with NVIDIA GA104 and AMD Navi22 GPUs

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 01:48 AM PDT

    Intel Iris Xe (DG1) discrete GPU from ASUS has been tested

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 11:56 AM PDT

    ASUS Zephyrus G14 (5900HS/RTX 3060) Gaming Benchmarks

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 05:52 AM PDT

    Should review graphs be sorted by 1% lows instead of averages?

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 01:14 AM PDT

    I believe sorting graphs by 1% lows would be much more valuable to the consumer.

    In my opinion 1% lows are much more important to the overall experience, especially when they differ vastly from the average.

    Average being the sorting option is a relict of time when people didn't know 1% lows are measurable and how much they impact gameplay. This is especially annoying when some review outlets sort by average and randomness in case of the same average result. You can get a product with 100 fps average and 39 1% lows placed higher on the performance graph than a product with 100 fps average and 70 1% lows for unknown reasons.

    If it were up to me I'd sort graphs using the following:

    • highest 1% lows,

    • highest 0,1% lows are a tiebreaker

    • average if the 1% and 0,1% lows results are the same

    Similarly, any cost per frame calculations should IMHO be done based on 1% lows.

    submitted by /u/AggressiveFudgePeak
    [link] [comments]

    [AnandTech] Interview with Jim Keller Pt 2

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 09:40 AM PDT

    Anandtech: "Google Announces AMD Milan-based Cloud Instances"

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 08:36 AM PDT

    [ETA Prime] This Prebuilt Has A Dedicated Intel Graphics Card! Intel DG1 Iris Xe

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 08:36 AM PDT

    (Digitimes) ASRock optimistic about 2Q21

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 11:32 PM PDT

    A Historical Look at the VAX: Microprocessor Economics of the '80s and '90s.

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 12:02 PM PDT

    Tachyum CEO Unveils Prodigy FPGA Prototype at GLOBSEC Forum 2021

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 02:55 AM PDT

    The Six Five Summit: "A Conversation with Arm's Simon Segars and NVIDIA's Jensen Huang"

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 02:12 PM PDT

    [Tom's Hardware Youtube] Interview with Viotek

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 07:29 PM PDT

    A blast from the past: Prices of DDR4 in 2015

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 11:24 AM PDT

    Tyan Transport CX: Perfect for VMWare Clustering! Our build with Epyc 7743

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 10:38 AM PDT

    NVIDIA and the battle for the future of AI chips

    Posted: 17 Jun 2021 11:31 AM PDT

    Ryzen 5 5600G vs 5600X - The Truth

    Posted: 18 Jun 2021 03:47 AM PDT

    No comments:

    Post a Comment