| TSMC and Micron now face 'red alert' as Taiwanese water crisis worsens Posted: 25 Mar 2021 11:46 AM PDT |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Meta Review: 15 reviews & 4240 benchmarks compiled Posted: 25 Mar 2021 09:49 PM PDT - compilation of 15 launch reviews with ~4240 gaming benchmarks at all resolutions
- only benchmarks under real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks
- geometric mean in all cases
- stock performance on reference/FE boards, no overclocking
- SAM & rBAR sometimes enabled, sometimes not - right now we are in the middle of this adaption
- standard performance without RayTracing, extra RayTracing benchmarks at WQHD resolution
- performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks
- for the full results check 3DCenter's launch analysis
| | 3060Ti vs 6700XT | 6700XT vs 3070 | | FullHD | 3060Ti is –4.6% slower, 6700XT is +4.8% faster | 6700XT is –6.4% slower, 3070 is +6.8% faster | | WQHD | 3060Ti is –4.7% slower, 6700XT is +4.9% faster | 6700XT is –7.8% slower, 3070 is +8.5% faster | | 4K | 3060Ti is –1.9% slower, 6700XT is +1.9% faster | 6700XT is –11.2% slower, 3070 is +12.6% faster | | FullHD/1080p | Tests | 3060 | 3060Ti | 3070 | 3080 | 5700XT | 6700XT | 6800 | 6800XT | | Gen & Mem | | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 10GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | RDNA2 16GB | RDNA2 16GB | | ComputerBase | (17) | 72.0% | 93.4% | 106.0% | 127.5% | 77.3% | 100% | 115.5% | 136.0% | | Golem | (8) | 73.8% | 90.0% | 100.5% | 117.2% | 78.8% | 100% | 115.1% | 127.7% | | Eurogamer | (12) | 74.8% | 96.0% | 105.0% | 125.2% | 80.8% | 100% | 117.7% | 122.2% | | Guru3D | (14) | 78.4% | 97.8% | 107.1% | 122.3% | 83.3% | 100% | 114.9% | 126.6% | | HWLuxx | (12) | 76.5% | 97.7% | 111.3% | 126.3% | 81.4% | 100% | 113.9% | 126.1% | | HW Upgrade | (12) | 72.0% | 94.0% | 102.7% | 121.8% | 81.0% | 100% | 113.2% | 127.7% | | Igor's Lab | (10) | 73.6% | 96.1% | 105.9% | - | 77.5% | 100% | 112.6% | 127.3% | | Le Comptoir | (14) | 75.5% | 96.3% | 106.8% | - | 75.3% | 100% | 115.0% | - | | PCGH | (20) | 76.6% | 99.3% | 113.7% | 143.0% | 82.4% | 100% | 118.2% | 139.6% | | PurePC | (9) | 76.7% | 98.9% | 112.5% | 142.6% | 80.1% | 100% | 118.3% | 137.5% | | SweClockers | (12) | 75.1% | 95.8% | 108.3% | 135.8% | 78.3% | 100% | 117.5% | 131.7% | | TechPowerUp | (23) | 75% | 94% | 104% | 120% | 80% | 100% | 112% | 125% | | Tom's HW | (13) | 72.6% | 93.2% | 100.6% | 120.3% | 79.2% | 100% | 114.3% | 129.3% | | Tweakers | (11) | 74.3% | 92.7% | 104.8% | - | 78.9% | 100% | 112.3% | - | | average FullHD Perf. | | 74.7% | 95.4% | 106.8% | 127.8% | 79.6% | 100% | 114.9% | 130.6% | | MSRP | | $329 | $399 | $499 | $699 | $399 | $479 | $579 | $649 | | TDP (GCP/TBP) | | 170W | 200W | 220W | 320W | 225W | 230W | 250W | 300W | | WQHD/1440p | Tests | 3060 | 3060Ti | 3070 | 3080 | 5700XT | 6700XT | 6800 | 6800XT | | Gen & Mem | | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 10GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | RDNA2 16GB | RDNA2 16GB | | ComputerBase | (17) | 71.4% | 93.9% | 107.5% | 133.2% | 76.2% | 100% | 117.9% | 138.4% | | Golem | (8) | 75.6% | 92.3% | 103.1% | 126.8% | 76.5% | 100% | 118.9% | 136.5% | | Eurogamer | (12) | 72.6% | 95.5% | 107.8% | 134.5% | 76.3% | 100% | 118.9% | 133.7% | | Guru3D | (14) | 74.5% | 98.3% | 109.7% | 133.8% | 78.8% | 100% | 118.3% | 133.0% | | HWLuxx | (12) | 74.3% | 97.0% | 112.2% | 139.0% | 77.0% | 100% | 119.8% | 134.6% | | HW Upgrade | (12) | 69.7% | 92.4% | 101.9% | 130.0% | 77.2% | 100% | 116.1% | 133.8% | | Igor's Lab | (10) | 72.1% | 94.7% | 109.4% | - | 76.0% | 100% | 118.7% | 138.0% | | Le Comptoir | (14) | 75.0% | 97.2% | 110.2% | - | 74.3% | 100% | 118.6% | - | | PCGH | (20) | 76.3% | 99.2% | 114.4% | 148.0% | 81.4% | 100% | 120.8% | 143.2% | | PurePC | (9) | 76.3% | 99.3% | 113.2% | 146.6% | 78.2% | 100% | 121.8% | 141.0% | | SweClockers | (12) | 75.1% | 96.7% | 112.5% | 145.8% | 76.7% | 100% | 121.7% | 138.3% | | TechPowerUp | (23) | 72% | 92% | 104% | 128% | 76% | 100% | 117% | 132% | | Tom's HW | (13) | 70.8% | 93.2% | 102.9% | 128.0% | 76.7% | 100% | 119.1% | 135.1% | | Tweakers | (10) | 73.8% | 94.4% | 107.5% | - | 77.7% | 100% | 116.8% | - | | average WQHD Perf. | | 73.5% | 95.3% | 108.5% | 136.1% | 77.3% | 100% | 118.9% | 136.8% | | MSRP | | $329 | $399 | $499 | $699 | $399 | $479 | $579 | $649 | | TDP (GCP/TBP) | | 170W | 200W | 220W | 320W | 225W | 230W | 250W | 300W | | 4K/2160p | Tests | 3060 | 3060Ti | 3070 | 3080 | 5700XT | 6700XT | 6800 | 6800XT | | Gen & Mem | | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 10GB | RDNA1 8GB | RDNA2 12GB | RDNA2 16GB | RDNA2 16GB | | ComputerBase | (17) | - | 95.8% | 109.8% | 146.0% | - | 100% | 122.7% | 143.2% | | Golem | (8) | 82.9% | 97.3% | 108.7% | 149.8% | 76.6% | 100% | 127.3% | 148.3% | | Eurogamer | (12) | 74.3% | 100.0% | 114.5% | 152.5% | 77.2% | 100% | 125.9% | 144.6% | | Guru3D | (14) | 75.3% | 101.8% | 115.9% | 152.5% | 78.4% | 100% | 126.6% | 144.8% | | HWLuxx | (12) | 75.9% | 97.8% | 113.2% | 151.7% | 75.3% | 100% | 123.3% | 140.0% | | HW Upgrade | (12) | 71.6% | 95.4% | 107.7% | 143.2% | 76.1% | 100% | 121.4% | 143.2% | | PCGH | (20) | 77.2% | 99.0% | 114.7% | 156.4% | 79.9% | 100% | 124.7% | 146.5% | | PurePC | (9) | 78.4% | 104.5% | 119.8% | 160.5% | 78.8% | 100% | 128.7% | 148.1% | | SweClockers | (12) | 75.8% | 98.3% | 114.3% | 157.1% | 75.6% | 100% | 125.2% | 142.0% | | TechPowerUp | (23) | 73% | 97% | 111% | 144% | 76% | 100% | 124% | 142% | | Tom's HW | (13) | 72.5% | 97.8% | 109.7% | 146.2% | 78.2% | 100% | 127.0% | 147.6% | | Tweakers | (10) | 75.2% | 98.1% | 114.4% | - | 77.9% | 100% | 123.1% | - | | average 4K Perf. | | 75.1% | 98.1% | 112.6% | 150.4% | 76.7% | 100% | 124.6% | 144.1% | | MSRP | | $329 | $399 | $499 | $699 | $399 | $479 | $579 | $649 | | TDP (GCP/TBP) | | 170W | 200W | 220W | 320W | 225W | 230W | 250W | 300W | | RayTracing @ WQHD (no DLSS) | Tests | 3060 | 3060Ti | 3070 | 3080 | 6700XT | 6800 | 6800XT | | Gen & Mem | | Ampere 12GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 8GB | Ampere 10GB | RDNA2 12GB | RDNA2 16GB | RDNA2 16GB | | ComputerBase | (3) | 95.3% | 124.8% | 142.3% | 184.2% | 100% | 119.5% | 138.6% | | HWLuxx | (5) | 106.1% | 138.8% | 166.0% | 209.5% | 100% | 137.5% | 159.3% | | Hardware Upgrade | (4) | 96.8% | 130.9% | 145.0% | 196.2% | 100% | 118.5% | 145.0% | | Les Numeriques | (4) | 108.8% | 139.0% | 165.9% | - | 100% | 135.4% | 154.9% | | PCGH | (7) | 97.5% | 120.4% | 138.6% | - | 100% | 121.3% | - | | SweClockers | (4) | 92.9% | 119.1% | 137.6% | 174.5% | 100% | 114.8% | 131.4% | | average RayTracing Perf. @ WQHD | | 98.9% | 126.5% | 146.2% | 189.2% | 100% | 123.5% | 144.4% | | MSRP | | $329 | $399 | $499 | $699 | $479 | $579 | $649 | | TDP (GCP/TBP) | | 170W | 200W | 220W | 320W | 230W | 250W | 300W | - following gains of Radeon RX 6700 XT are based on the benchmarks above
- comparison to older (not tested above) cards is based on the 3DC Performance Index
- if there is no benchmark available, WQHD performance is the average of FullHD & 4K index
- "WQHD/Watt" is the energy effiency, normalized to the WQHD performance
| Gain of Radeon RX 6700 XT | FullHD/1080p | WQHD/1440p | 4K/2160p | RT@WQHD | WQHD/Watt | | 6700XT vs RX 6800 | –13% | –16% | –20% | –19% | –12% | | 6700XT vs RX 5700 XT | +26% | +29% | +30% | - | +29% | | 6700XT vs RX 5700 | +45% | +47% | +50% | - | +15% | | 6700XT vs VII | +27% | +25% | +23% | - | +54% | | 6700XT vs RX Vega 64 | +60% | +62% | +64% | - | +117% | | 6700XT vs RX 590 | +129% | +139% | +149% | - | +138% | | 6700XT vs RX 470 | +204% | +216% | +229% | - | +96% | | 6700XT vs RTX 3070 | –6% | –8% | –11% | –32% | –8% | | 6700XT vs RTX 3060 Ti | +5% | +5% | +2% | –21% | –4% | | 6700XT vs RTX 3060 | +34% | +36% | +33% | +1% | +5% | | 6700XT vs RTX 2080 Super | +8% | +7% | +6% | - | +18% | | 6700XT vs RTX 2070 Super | +21% | +22% | +22% | - | +18% | | 6700XT vs RTX 2060 Super | +42% | +44% | +47% | - | +14% | | 6700XT vs GTX 1660 Super | +94% | +104% | +115% | - | +47% | | 6700XT vs GTX 1080 Ti | +26% | +26% | +25% | - | +35% | | 6700XT vs GTX 1080 | +55% | +60% | +64% | - | +26% | | 6700XT vs GTX 1070 | +86% | +94% | +103% | - | +29% | | 6700XT vs GTX 1060 6GB | +153% | +168% | +186% | - | +41% | | 6700XT vs GTX 980 Ti | +99% | +107% | +117% | - | +121% | | 6700XT vs GTX 980 | +148% | +164% | +182% | - | +107% | | 6700XT vs GTX 970 | +192% | +216% | +244% | - | +129% | | 6700XT vs GTX 960 | +338% | +390% | +456% | - | +141% | Source: 3DCenter.org submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi [link] [comments] |
| Modded RX 6700XT Thermal Pad Testing Posted: 25 Mar 2021 06:26 PM PDT https://i.redd.it/p04ltj8ar9p61.png Reposting here from my OC in r/AMD since crossposting is not allowed. I was able to snag a reference 6700XT at launch at a Microcenter. While I was thrilled to get a card at the actual MSRP, I wasn't too thrilled with the thermal performance of the reference cooler - especially for the VRAM and VRM. I took off the backplate and added 2mm thermal pads between the backplate and the back of the PCB where the GDDR6 and VRM components are. Very pleased with the results! 7-8 C drops for the VRAM and VRM components as reported by HWInfo during a 12 minute Furmark stress test. submitted by /u/treesofvalinor [link] [comments] |
| [Gamers Nexus] High-End AMD: Sapphire RX 6700 XT Nitro+ Tear-Down Posted: 25 Mar 2021 09:15 PM PDT |
| Meteor Lake, Intel's first 7nm CPU, to tape in before July this year and release in 2023 Posted: 25 Mar 2021 12:24 PM PDT |
| Apple M1 8-core chip surpasses Intel Core i7-11700K in PassMark single thread benchmark Posted: 25 Mar 2021 04:56 AM PDT |
| We build the Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X PC (Next-Gen-Konsole nachgestellt: Wir bauen den Playstation-5- und Xbox-Series-X-PC - Golem.de) Posted: 26 Mar 2021 01:03 AM PDT |
| [VideoCardz] NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti could feature 8GB and 16GB GDDR6X variants Posted: 25 Mar 2021 11:19 PM PDT |
| Intel's Raja Koduri teases 'Petaflops in your palm' with over 100 billion transistors Posted: 25 Mar 2021 09:45 PM PDT |
| Anandtech: "Qualcomm Announces Snapdragon 780G: New 5nm 765 Successor" Posted: 25 Mar 2021 07:11 AM PDT |
| Samsung stacks 512GB onto a single stick of DDR5 RAM Posted: 25 Mar 2021 10:24 AM PDT |
| Any idea as to when we'll be getting X86 SBCs that have a small form factor, are inexpensive, but will be more powerful than the Z8350? Posted: 25 Mar 2021 12:07 PM PDT I'm really impressed with the Rock Pi X SBC for the simple fact that I think it's great for the price and size, as I actually want a X86 SBC that is less than $80 and is about the same size as the Raspberry Pi 4 (if not smaller). The Rock Pi X has shown that it certainly meets this criteria. However, I can't help but wonder if something will be getting released soon that will be similarly priced, will have a small form factor, but will be a LOT more powerful. Because as it stands, the Z8350 chip is getting on a bit. Any idea as to when we'll be getting something more powerful? submitted by /u/prankster999 [link] [comments] |
| Qualcomm launches the Snapdragon 780G, mid-range SoC with two high-performance Arm Cortex-A78 cores from the Snapdragon 888 Posted: 25 Mar 2021 06:37 AM PDT |
No comments:
Post a Comment