• Breaking News

    Wednesday, November 4, 2020

    Hardware support: Reminder: Please do not submit tech support or build questions to /r/hardware

    Hardware support: Reminder: Please do not submit tech support or build questions to /r/hardware


    Reminder: Please do not submit tech support or build questions to /r/hardware

    Posted: 02 Oct 2015 02:04 PM PDT

    For the newer members in our community, please take a moment to review our rules in the sidebar. If you are looking for tech support, want help building a computer, or have questions about what you should buy please don't post here. Instead try /r/buildapc or /r/techsupport, subreddits dedicated to building and supporting computers, or consider if another of our related subreddits might be a better fit:

    EDIT: And for a full list of rules, click here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/about/rules

    Thanks from the /r/Hardware Mod Team!

    submitted by /u/Echrome
    [link] [comments]

    AMD Reaches Highest CPU Market Share Since 2007, Q3 2020 Report

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 09:43 AM PST

    First HDMI 2.1 receivers reportedly have faulty HDMI 2.1 chip

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 06:34 AM PST

    (VideoCardz.com) Kopite7kimi: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti rumored to feature 10496 CUDA cores and 20GB GDDR6X memory

    Posted: 04 Nov 2020 12:43 AM PST

    nVidia GeForce RTX 3070 Meta Review: FullHD, WQHD & 4K benchmarks compiled

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 09:43 AM PST

    • compilation of 13 launch reviews with ~4420 gaming benchmarks
    • only benchmarks under real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks
    • geometric mean in all cases
    • stock performance on reference/FE boards, no overclocking
    • performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks and more tested GPUs
    • missing results were interpolated for the average based on the available results
    • energy efficiency and price-performance ratio based on the 4k performance
    • note: the following tables are very broad, the last column should show you the GeForce RTX 3090

     

    Gain of GeForce RTX 3070 FullHD WQHD 4K Energy Eff. Price/Perf.
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 3090 -22% -27% -33% +9% +101%
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 3080 -16% -20% -25% +11% +5%
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ±0 +1% -1% +23% +138%
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 2080 Super +15% +17% +19% +34% +67%
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 2070 Super +29% +33% +37% +35% +37%
    3070 vs. GeForce RTX 2060 Super +50% +58% +65% +33% +32%
    3070 vs. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti +34% +38% +41% +54% +98%
    3070 vs. Radeon VII +36% +37% +38% +72% +93%
    3070 vs. Radeon RX 5700 XT +37% +43% +50% +51% +20%
    3070 vs. Radeon RX 5700 +53% +61% +69% +33% +18%

     

    FullHD Tests 5700 5700XT R7 1080Ti 2060S 2070S 2080S 2080Ti 3070 3080 3090
    Gen & Mem   RDNA1 8GB RDNA1 8GB Vega 16GB Pascal 11GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 11GB Amp. 8GB Amp. 10GB Amp. 24GB
    ComputB (17) - 70.4% 69.8% 72.9% - 75.9% 85.0% 98.0% 100% 119.0% 125.0%
    Golem (10) - 74.3% - 68.7% - - - 97.7% 100% 115.5% -
    Igor's (10) 68.5% 75.8% 74.2% - 69.3% 77.5% 84.1% 92.9% 100% 110.6% -
    KitGuru (11) 64.4% 72.3% 73.6% 76.2% - 77.9% 88.0% 101.6% 100% 119.0% -
    OverclC (13) - 74.0% - - 68.3% 78.0% 85.7% 99.1% 100% 112.1% -
    PCGH (20) 62.7% 72.1% 72.1% 75.0% 64.0% 76.9% 86.5% 99.8% 100% 123.4% 132.6%
    PurePC (8) - 71.4% 72.8% 71.7% - 76.7% 86.9% 99.8% 100% 126.0% 139.4%
    SweCl (12) 64.6% 73.1% 73.8% 73.1% 64.6% 76.9% 87.7% 100.8% 100% 124.6% 134.6%
    TechPU (23) 68% 75% 76% 77% 69% 80% 89% 101% 100% 116% 121%
    Tom's (9) 69.0% 76.2% - - - 80.4% 89.3% 101.4% 100% 119.4% 126.9%
    Tweakers (10) - 78.5% - - 71.2% 81.3% 89.1% 99.0% 100% 113.0% -
    FullHD aver.Perf.   65.3% 73.2% 73.6% 74.4% 66.5% 77.5% 86.9% 99.6% 100% 119.4% 127.6%
    MSRP   $349 $399 $699 $699 $399 $499 $699 $1199 $499 $699 $1499
    TDP   175W 225W 300W 250W 175W 215W 250W 260W 220W 320W 350W

     

    WQHD Perf. Tests 5700 5700XT R7 1080Ti 2060S 2070S 2080S 2080Ti 3070 3080 3090
    Gen & Mem   RDNA1 8GB RDNA1 8GB Vega 16GB Pascal 11GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 11GB Amp. 8GB Amp. 10GB Amp. 24GB
    ComputB (17) - 67.5% 69.7% 71.0% - 73.5% 83.4% 98.9% 100% 126.3% 137.6%
    Golem (10) - 70.6% - 66.6% - - - 99.2% 100% 126.5% -
    Igor's (10) 66.1% 73.7% 73.0% - 66.5% 75.7% 83.2% 93.6% 100% 115.5% -
    KitGuru (11) 61.4% 68.8% 72.9% 73.8% - 75.5% 86.5% 102.0% 100% 126.9% -
    LesNum (9) 64.3% 72.4% 76.4% 77.4% 69.8% 79.9% 92.0% 100.0% 100% 111.1% -
    OverclC (13) - 68.4% - - 63.7% 73.8% 83.2% 99.2% 100% 122.4% -
    PCGH (20) 60.0% 69.2% 71.5% 72.8% 61.7% 74.5% 84.5% 99.8% 100% 129.7% 145.0%
    PurePC (8) - 69.3% 73.4% 70.7% - 75.4% 86.0% 99.7% 100% 129.1% 144.0%
    SweCl (12) 61.5% 68.9% 72.6% 69.6% 61.5% 74.1% 85.2% 100.0% 100% 129.6% 142.2%
    TechPU (23) 62% 70% 74% 73% 64% 76% 86% 99% 100% 123% 131%
    TechSp (14) 66.5% 74.9% 75.4% 78.2% 62.2% 76.4% 86.5% 99.9% 100% 121.2% 129.1%
    Tom's (9) 65.0% 72.1% - - - 76.9% 86.9% 102.2% 100% 125.5% 136.8%
    Tweakers (10) - 73.5% - - 66.9% 77.3% 85.8% 99.0% 100% 121.7% -
    WQHD aver.Perf.   62.1% 69.9% 72.9% 72.3% 63.4% 75.0% 85.3% 99.5% 100% 125.2% 136.8%
    MSRP   $349 $399 $699 $699 $399 $499 $699 $1199 $499 $699 $1499
    TDP   175W 225W 300W 250W 175W 215W 250W 260W 220W 320W 350W

     

    4K Perf. Tests 5700 5700XT R7 1080Ti 2060S 2070S 2080S 2080Ti 3070 3080 3090
    Gen & Mem   RDNA1 8GB RDNA1 8GB Vega 16GB Pascal 11GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 11GB Amp. 8GB Amp. 10GB Amp. 24GB
    ComputB (17) - 66.1% 71.7% 70.6% - 73.0% 82.8% 101.2% 100% 132.2% 146.8%
    Golem (10) - 65.9% - 65.7% - - - 104.0% 100% 138.4% -
    Igor's (10) 60.6% 69.3% 71.1% - 60.4% 71.2% 81.5% 96.2% 100% 126.1% 139.5%
    KitGuru (11) 57.5% 65.2% 72.2% 71.1% - 73.1% 84.6% 102.0% 100% 134.0% -
    LesNum (9) - 65.9% 72.3% 71.4% - 75.5% 86.4% 100.9% 100% 134.5% 148.2%
    OverclC (13) - 65.9% - - 61.5% 71.6% 83.0% 100.7% 100% 132.0% -
    PCGH (20) 58.6% 67.6% 72.6% 73.1% 60.3% 72.8% 84.2% 102.1% 100% 137.6% 159.0%
    PurePC (8) - 66.3% 72.9% 68.6% - 73.2% 84.3% 99.6% 100% 133.8% 150.7%
    SweCl (12) 59.6% 66.9% 73.5% 69.9% 59.6% 73.5% 85.3% 101.5% 100% 137.5% 153.7%
    TechPU (23) 59% 66% 71% 70% 61% 72% 83% 99% 100% 131% 144%
    TechSp (14) 61.3% 68.6% 73.3% 76.4% 59.3% 72.7% 84.2% 100.8% 100% 133.2% 146.2%
    Tom's (9) 61.9% 68.5% - - - 73.8% 84.8% 102.5% 100% 134.7% 151.5%
    Tweakers (10) - 69.5% - - 63.5% 75.0% 84.3% 101.6% 100% 130.7% -
    4K aver.Perf.   59.2% 66.8% 72.4% 70.7% 60.6% 72.8% 83.9% 100.9% 100% 133.9% 149.7%
    MSRP   $349 $399 $699 $699 $399 $499 $699 $1199 $499 $699 $1499
    TDP   175W 225W 300W 250W 175W 215W 250W 260W 220W 320W 350W

     

    Power Draw 5700 5700XT VII 2060S 2070 2070S 2080 2080S 2080Ti 3070 3080 3090
    Gen & Mem RDNA1 8GB RDNA1 8GB Vega 16GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 8GB Turing 11GB Ampere 8GB Ampere 10GB Ampere 24GB
    ComputB 176W 210W 271W 174W - 221W 228W 241W 270W 220W 322W 351W
    Golem 178W 224W 287W 176W - 217W 227W 254W 269W 221W 319W 357W
    Guru3D 162W 204W 299W 163W 166W 209W 230W 254W 266W 208W 338W 364W
    HWLuxx 173W 230W 259W 189W - - 244W 251W 283W 221W 332W -
    Igor's 171W 250W 260W 174W 188W 205W 226W 231W 270W 215W 322W 350W
    LeCompt 185W 212W 271W 174W - 217W 232W 245W 272W 227W 324W 365W
    LesNum 173W 233W 271W 176W 183W 219W 233W 247W 288W 233W 326W 370W
    PCGH 183W 222W 262W 181W - 224W 224W 253W 267W 221W 330W 355W
    TechPU 166W 219W 268W 184W 195W 211W 215W 243W 273W 220W 303W 341W
    Tweakers 164W 213W 280W 176W 183W 210W 233W 245W 274W 214W 320W 361W
    aver. PowerDr. 173W 221W 273W 176W 185W 215W 228W 246W 272W 219W 325W 356W
    TDP 175W 225W 300W 175W 185W 215W 225W 250W 260W 220W 320W 350W

     

    Source: 3DCenter.org

    submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi
    [link] [comments]

    [Lawrence Timme]Ryzen 5 5600X 4.85ghz OC Water Cooled and Memory Tweaking 3800C12

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 06:29 PM PST

    AMD Radeon RX 6000 series to support games with Microsoft DXR and Vulcan ray tracing APIs - VideoCardz.com

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 05:05 AM PST

    LG CX & C9 Unlikely to Get Fix for VRR Gamma Issue Caused by OLED Panel

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 12:52 PM PST

    Xbox Series X Does Not Support Dolby Vision 4K Blu-ray Playback

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 04:36 PM PST

    Arm: "Arm Cortex-A78C CPU: Secure and scalable performance for next-generation on-the-go devices"

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 10:48 AM PST

    [Hardware Unboxed] LG 27GN950 Review, Next-Gen 4K 144Hz Monitors Are Here

    Posted: 04 Nov 2020 02:03 AM PST

    [VideoCardz] GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti EAGLE OC graphics card leaked

    Posted: 04 Nov 2020 02:00 AM PST

    UK retailer Scan's page on expected/recieved 3000 series stock.

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 03:30 AM PST

    Why don't we have x86 CPUs on a pcie card?

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 04:52 AM PST

    Assuming your workload needs a CPU, why can't I just buy 6 pcie cards each with e.g. 2 sockets, pack them with off the shelf CPUs and RAM and stuff everything into 1 motherboard? Why do I need a whole new server - why can't we just add CPUs like we add GPUs?

    Perhaps the latency wouldn't be the lowest but there are workloads that don't need to communicate with all CPUs all the time (as is e.g. the case with GPU workloads).

    Or add a network port and have a whole computer on a pcie card.

    submitted by /u/jmakov
    [link] [comments]

    Effect of memory bandwidth and memory compression on VRAM usage

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 09:07 AM PST

    Hey!

    So there are lots of discussions online about whether the 10/8GB of VRAM that the 3080/3070 has is enough. There are two things that I read about in regards to the Ampere cards, and I wanted to ask you guys if you think they have an effect on the VRAM usage of these cards.

    The first one is memory bandwidth. Now the way I understand it is that bandwidth helps the graphics card move data in and out of memory faster. The way that it could reduce VRAM usage is that less data is loaded into the VRAM at the same time, since the card has enough bandwidth to remove data that isn't being used quickly. Every scene in the game is different, the GPU has to do this constantly, and I think it's possible that it if the GPU doesn't have enough bandwidth then if it wants to load new data into the memory, it can't because it couldn't delete unused data fast enough. So if what I said is correct, then while the 3080 only has 10GB of VRAM it's possible that has to use less of it then it would have to if it had slower memory. The 3070 sadly only uses GDDR6 and only has a 256 bit bus so this might be less relevant there.

    The second one is something I know very little about and peaple rarely talk about this (even Nvidia), so this might not be that relevant, but Nvidia claims on their website that it uses "new memory compression techniques". So the way I understand this is compression means ways to reduce file size, which would logically follow then that if Ampere's memory compression is superior then previous generations then when it loads the same textures into it's VRAM as a previous GPU it takes up less space without losing any quality. This could also help the 3070 and lower tier cards. Now this is just my logic from what I know about data compression which is very little, so that's why I'm asking you guys.

    Long story short, if I'm correct does that mean that you can't directly compare the 10GB of VRAM on the 3080 to previous generations because they had lower memory bandwidth and less advanced memory compression? Or am I completely wrong here?

    submitted by /u/K1llrzzZ
    [link] [comments]

    WD Black AN1500 2TB AIC SSD Review - KitGuru

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 04:13 AM PST

    Why are CPUs and GPUs glossy silver, and memory always matte black?

    Posted: 03 Nov 2020 03:17 AM PST

    Aren't they both made of silicon? Is it because of different surface flatness?

    Edit: I think I need to clarify, i mean the actual dies, not the IHS.

    submitted by /u/LeSchmetterling
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment