Hardware support: (MSI) MSI's Entire Line-Up of AMD 400 Series Motherboards Will Support Ryzen™ 5000 Series Processors |
- (MSI) MSI's Entire Line-Up of AMD 400 Series Motherboards Will Support Ryzen™ 5000 Series Processors
- Sony's $5,000 eye-tracking Spatial Reality Display can create holograms without a headset
- [Anandtech] - AMD Zen 3: An AnandTech Interview with CTO Mark Papermaster
- (AHOC/Buildzoid)GPU PCB Breakdown: RTX 3080 TUF (basically the same as RTX 3090 TUF)
- First ARM Apple MacBook will debut in November 17
- Intel Core i7 1165G7 "Tiger Lake" Linux Performance With The Dell XPS 13 9310
- New Alienware AW3821DW Monitor User's Guide added in Dell
- Nvidia and EuroHPC Team for Four Supercomputers, Including Massive 'Leonardo' System
- Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX with 32″ IPS Panel, 4K Resolution, 144Hz, G-sync Ultimate and HDR 1400
- ID-Cooling SE 914 XT Basic & SE 914 XT ARGB Review
- Intel’s Latest Celeron and Pentium CPUs Finally Get AVX2, AVX-512 Support
- Asus H81M-plus HDMI not work
- Clock Tuner for Ryzen gets its first major update (CTR 1.1) - VideoCardz.com
- [TechPowerUp] NVIDIA Updates Video Encode and Decode Matrix with Reference to Ampere GPUs
- Chinese SMIC Tapes Out First N+1 ‘7 nm’ Chip, But Mass Production Uncertain
- CPU comparison question
- Intel And Synopsys Demo 32GT/sec PCIe 5.0 Interoperability With Next-Gen Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPUs
- How about getting reviewers to consider lower-than-native but easy-to-scale resolutions for gaming on large displays?
(MSI) MSI's Entire Line-Up of AMD 400 Series Motherboards Will Support Ryzen™ 5000 Series Processors Posted: 16 Oct 2020 12:14 PM PDT |
Sony's $5,000 eye-tracking Spatial Reality Display can create holograms without a headset Posted: 16 Oct 2020 03:54 PM PDT |
[Anandtech] - AMD Zen 3: An AnandTech Interview with CTO Mark Papermaster Posted: 16 Oct 2020 06:04 AM PDT |
(AHOC/Buildzoid)GPU PCB Breakdown: RTX 3080 TUF (basically the same as RTX 3090 TUF) Posted: 16 Oct 2020 08:42 PM PDT |
First ARM Apple MacBook will debut in November 17 Posted: 16 Oct 2020 02:04 PM PDT |
Intel Core i7 1165G7 "Tiger Lake" Linux Performance With The Dell XPS 13 9310 Posted: 16 Oct 2020 11:14 AM PDT |
New Alienware AW3821DW Monitor User's Guide added in Dell Posted: 16 Oct 2020 12:21 PM PDT Noticed that Dell added some documents for their new 38 inch monitor. Quite looking forward to this one and the others due to their G Sync Ultimate compatibility. Below is a snippet of the main features - Product features The Alienware AW3821DW monitor has an active matrix, Thin-Film Transistor (TFT), Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) and LED backlight. The monitor features include: • 95.29 cm (37.52 inch) viewable area (measured diagonally). Resolution: Up to 3840 x 1600 through DisplayPort and HDMI, with full-screen support or lower resolutions, supporting a high refresh rate of 144 Hz. • NVIDIA® G-SYNC® ULTIMATE monitor with a rapid response time of 1 ms gray to gray in Extreme mode*. • Color gamut of 130.6% sRGB and DCI P3 95%. • Tilt, swivel, and height adjustment capabilities. • Removable stand and Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA™) 100 mm mounting holes for flexible mounting solutions. • Digital connectivity via 1 DisplayPort and 2 HDMI ports. • Equipped with 1 SuperSpeed USB 5 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen1) Type B upstream port, 1 SuperSpeed USB 5 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen1) Type-A downstream charging port, and 3 SuperSpeed USB 5 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen1) Type-A downstream ports. • Plug and play capability if supported by your system. • On-Screen Display (OSD) adjustments for ease of setup and screen optimization. • AW3821DW offers a couple of preset modes, including FPS (First-Person Shooter), MOBA/RTS (Real-Time Strategy), RPG (Role-Playing Game), SPORTS (Racing) and three customizable game modes for user's own preference. In addition, key enhanced gaming features such as Timer, Frame Rate, and Display Alignment are provided to help improve gamer's performance and provide best-in game advantage. • < 0.3 W in Standby Mode. • VESA DisplayHDR™ 600. • Optimize eye comfort with a flicker-free screen. [link] [comments] |
Nvidia and EuroHPC Team for Four Supercomputers, Including Massive 'Leonardo' System Posted: 16 Oct 2020 09:23 AM PDT |
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX with 32″ IPS Panel, 4K Resolution, 144Hz, G-sync Ultimate and HDR 1400 Posted: 16 Oct 2020 10:52 AM PDT |
ID-Cooling SE 914 XT Basic & SE 914 XT ARGB Review Posted: 16 Oct 2020 11:54 AM PDT |
Intel’s Latest Celeron and Pentium CPUs Finally Get AVX2, AVX-512 Support Posted: 16 Oct 2020 02:38 AM PDT |
Posted: 17 Oct 2020 01:53 AM PDT good morning [link] [comments] |
Clock Tuner for Ryzen gets its first major update (CTR 1.1) - VideoCardz.com Posted: 17 Oct 2020 01:52 AM PDT |
[TechPowerUp] NVIDIA Updates Video Encode and Decode Matrix with Reference to Ampere GPUs Posted: 16 Oct 2020 02:17 AM PDT |
Chinese SMIC Tapes Out First N+1 ‘7 nm’ Chip, But Mass Production Uncertain Posted: 16 Oct 2020 02:34 AM PDT |
Posted: 16 Oct 2020 09:59 AM PDT Hi, I don't know if I break some rules but I will try. If it is the case, sorry. I'm not an expert so if I will say something stupid, excuse me. How should be made a CPU comparison? In the last year I see comparisons like i9 10900k vs r9 3900x or r9 3950x. Is it correct (technically) comparing a 12c/24t or 16c/32t with a 10c/20t? For me is enough normal that a 12c or 16c cpu is more powerfull vs a cpu with lower core count. The comparison should not be like i7 10700k vs r7 3800x? All the 2 have 8c/16t. On the other side I understand that there are not counterparts for 3900x or 3950x and that they test their best performer cpus with best performer counterpart cpus. This is not a debate about what is the best cpu/brand. So what should be the correct way to compare cpus performances to avoid to compare apples with pears? Thank you. [link] [comments] |
Intel And Synopsys Demo 32GT/sec PCIe 5.0 Interoperability With Next-Gen Sapphire Rapids Xeon CPUs Posted: 16 Oct 2020 02:40 AM PDT |
Posted: 16 Oct 2020 05:35 AM PDT The res I'm referring to belong to 2 classes (which I don't know how to call in fewer words):
Later edit: The above is called integer scaling and is a feature added in the last year via new drivers by all GPU vendors.
Problems:
Solution 1: Gaming at res like (A)/(B) would have the highest chance of avoiding (3) because those res are easiest on a display's scaler (for obvious reasons). I think many who primarily use their PC for work & movies would consider a display that avoids (3) a decent [temporary] compromise when it comes to gaming. I know I would gladly game at lower res if I could do that without (3) on a 5120x2160 display like the ones LG will enable next year. Solution 2: AFAIK some GPUs have the ability to always output native res to the display and do all the scaling in the GPU. While this feature could be an ideal solution, I can't remember the last GPU review where this was analysed. There is no reason to believe it will avoid all of (3) but I would surely bet on this having a better chance than relying on display scalers. Do you have experiences with gaming at these lower than native res without running into (3)?Would you consider this issue worthy of being covered in reviews?[link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment