• Breaking News

    Wednesday, May 13, 2020

    Hardware support: [Nvidia] What’s Jensen been cooking?

    Hardware support: [Nvidia] What’s Jensen been cooking?


    [Nvidia] What’s Jensen been cooking?

    Posted: 12 May 2020 07:15 AM PDT

    Radeon RX 5600 XT: Clock rates overview - 12 & 14 Gbps models

    Posted: 13 May 2020 12:27 AM PDT

    Last week, AMD promote the use of 14 Gbps memory clock on the Radeon RX 5600 XT, as already known. With this, many (but not all) models with 12 Gbps memory speed change to 14 Gbps, resulting in new BIOS versions. I count a dozen of models, who started at launch times in January with 12 Gbps (maybe with a higher core clock, but not the higher memory clock), who change to 14 Gbps in March & April.

    But not all cards change to the higher memory speed: XFX divide their "Thicc" series into "12Gbps" and "14Gbps" variants. Beside this, the XFX Raw II, Asus Dual (non OC) and Asus Strix (non OC) never changed to the higher memory speed or got an extra 14 Gbps variant. So, most of the Radeon RX 5600 XT models are now at 14 Gbps (and definitely all important models), but still not all models.

     

    Game/Boost still with 12 Gbps 14 Gbps already at launch launched with 12 Gbps, but now with 14 Gbps new models with 14 Gbps
    1375/1560MHz - - MSI Mech -
    1420/1600MHz - - MSI Gaming -
    1460/1620MHz - - Gigabyte Windforce OC, MSI Mech OC -
    1560/1620MHz XFX Raw II, XFX Thicc II Pro 12Gbps PowerColor Red Dragon PowerColor 5600XT PowerColor V2, XFX Thicc II Pro 14Gbps
    1615/1750MHz Asus Dual, XFX Thicc III Pro 12Gbps MSI Gaming Z, Sapphire Pulse ASRock Challenger, ASRock Phantom Gaming D2, Asus Dual OC, Asus TUF Gaming X3 OC, MSI Gaming X Asus TUF Gaming X3 Top, XFX Thicc III Pro 14Gbps
    1660/1750MHz XFX Thicc III Ultra 12Gbps PowerColor Red Devil - XFX Thicc III Ultra 14Gbps
    1670/1750MHz Asus Strix Asus Strix Top, Gigabyte Gaming OC ASRock Phantom Gaming D3, Asus Strix OC -

     

    BIOS updates for the Radeon RX 5600 XT
    (not in all cases with the higher memory clock, sometimes just with a higher core clock)

     

    Source: 3DCenter.org

    submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi
    [link] [comments]

    [VideoCardz] AMD announces Radeon Pro VII featuring 16GB HBM2 memory and Infinity Fabric Link

    Posted: 13 May 2020 01:50 AM PDT

    Linus Tech Tips' review of the Schenker XMG Apex 15 laptop, a laptop with an R9 3950X processor

    Posted: 12 May 2020 12:07 PM PDT

    Intel H310 Motherboard Comes With Integrated GeForce GTX 1650 Graphics

    Posted: 13 May 2020 01:07 AM PDT

    Backblaze Hard Drive Stats Q1 2020

    Posted: 12 May 2020 10:31 AM PDT

    Literally just taking a look at a bunch of Crucial's new Ballistix memory sticks. 2x8 2x16 and 2x32.

    Posted: 12 May 2020 07:06 PM PDT

    [Dr. Ian Cutress] AMD plus Zen3 = AM4+ ? Chipset Roulette v2

    Posted: 12 May 2020 07:43 AM PDT

    [ServerTheHome] NVIDIA Tesla A100 HGX-2 Edition Shows Updated Specs

    Posted: 12 May 2020 09:14 AM PDT

    Ryzen 3 3300X Bottleneck Benchmark vs. 2080 Ti, 2070 Super, 2060 KO, & More GPUs

    Posted: 13 May 2020 01:42 AM PDT

    Amazon Makes Graviton2 AWS Instances Available

    Posted: 12 May 2020 09:04 AM PDT

    Intel confirms 8C/16T Core i9-10885H mobile processor

    Posted: 12 May 2020 05:22 AM PDT

    Intel Core i5-10400 Gets Benchmarked and tested, much faster SMT over Core i5 9400

    Posted: 12 May 2020 12:09 PM PDT

    Should open source BIOS be compulsory, at least as an option ?

    Posted: 13 May 2020 02:13 AM PDT

    I've posted this here several times, but after deletions and eventual ping-pong with redditors about what does/not constitute political post, I cleared and reformatted the text as my last effort.

    By BIOS I mean PC BIOS/UEFI as well as Mac and other equivalents, encompassing all applicable devices, notebooks, tablets, smartphones included.

    There are two main rationales for the question of open-source BIOS option:

    • Security
      BIOS is not something that you can choose not to use or to use some other BIOS. Furthermore, it is on lower level than your OS, so it can easily pack back-doors and sniffing malware that will not be detected by your OS ( UEFI, PSP, SMM blob, peripheral FW blobs, microcode blob etc)
    • Configurability and maintainability
      BIOS is often used to curb usability of particular board to particular market and to obsolete it for new models deliberately ahead of hardware necessity. Good examples are ECC support and support for particular CPU models on AM4 and earlier platforms ( AM3+, AM3 etc). There are probably tons of Intel examples that I'm not familiar with.

    Question is, since BIOS is part of every PC ( and has an equivalent on other platforms), shouldn't open-source version be compulsory, at least as an option ?

    With smartphones and tablets the situation is much more dire, as they contain much more sensors for spy applications, are much more exposed to hostile environment and are practically glued to the owner.

    I'm not saying that open-source must be sole or even default option. Just that everyone on the market should open their documentation sufficiently to enable purely open-source version, with working, available proof and that there should be a source available for every binary blob.

    That is, working open-source version should be available both as an proof of sufficiently opened documentation and as an actual option for the user.

    This would enable some disinfecting sunlight into the area and keep things safer even for users that otherwise don't care about open-source.

    Also, it would enable users to keep using hardware in the way the need to and to use it up to hardware obsolescence. Surely new green, recycling mentality should appreciate this.

    Just as couple latest examples that would greatly benefit from this are new Zen3 on AM4 platform and Intel's uncovered "bug" on Thunderbolt. There are bazzilion of others. Many seem to be deliberately inserted.

    Ideas, comments ?

    submitted by /u/Brane212
    [link] [comments]

    AMD axes Zen 3 support on 400-series motherboards: Is AMD pulling an Intel?

    Posted: 12 May 2020 04:36 AM PDT

    Are phones faster than today’s Laptops?

    Posted: 12 May 2020 04:44 PM PDT

    For example is an A13bionic chip in an ipad faster than a i5 9th gen laptop CPU? Edit: Final Conclusion - The ARM CPUs are quite shockingly fast but only at very specific and comparatively small tasks and in single threaded work loads so probably gaming might be faster but nothing else...excited to see the future of these chips...

    submitted by /u/ViPeR9503
    [link] [comments]

    No comments:

    Post a Comment