• Breaking News

    Wednesday, May 20, 2020

    Home Unlabelled Hardware support: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X Meta Review: 23 Launch Reviews compiled

    Hardware support: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X Meta Review: 23 Launch Reviews compiled

    May 20, 2020

    Hardware support: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X Meta Review: 23 Launch Reviews compiled

    AMD Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X Meta Review: 23 Launch Reviews compiled

    Posted: 19 May 2020 07:54 PM PDT

    • geometric mean in all cases
    • stock performance, no overclocking
    • compilation of 23 launch reviews with ~1420 application benchmarks & ~310 gaming benchmarks
    • gaming benchmarks not on average framerates, instead with 99th percentiles on 1080p resolution (AnandTech: 95th percentile; Golem & PCGH: 720p)
    • Core i3-9100 instead of 9100F at PCMag, Tom's Hardware & Tweakers
    • Core i5-9400 instead of 9400F at Lab501, The FPS Review & Tweakers
    • list prices: Intel tray, AMD boxed; retail prices: all boxed
    • retail prices of Newegg (US) and Geizhals (DE = Germany, incl. 19% VAT)
    • performance average is (moderate) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks and more tested CPUs
    • missing results were interpolated for the average based on the available results
    • note: the following tables are very wide, the last column should show you the Ryzen 5 2600

     

    Applic. Tests 3100 3300X 7700K 9100F 9400F 3400G 1600 1600AF 1600X 2600
    Gen. & Cores   Zen2 4C/8T Zen2 4C/8T KBL 4C/8T CFL 4C/4T CFL 6C/6T Zen+ 4C/8T Zen 6C/12T Zen+ 6C/12T Zen 6C/12T Zen+ 6C/12T
    AnandT (18) 86.8% 100% 82.5% - - - 82.8% - - 90.9%
    Benchm (6) 93.1% 100% - - 87.7% - - - - 106.1%
    CBase (8) 90% 100% 89% 62% 92% 76% - - 106% 110%
    Cowcotl (14) 89.5% 100% - 75.9% 88.5% - - - - -
    eTeknix (13) 92.0% 100% 95.6% - - 75.0% 90.1% - - -
    GamersN (8) 89.1% 100% 89.4% 67.1% - 71.8% - 100.4% - -
    Golem (5) 89.9% 100% 88.2% 63.9% - - - 94.8% - -
    HWLuxx (10) 87.0% 100% 86.4% - 83.0% - - - - 103.8%
    KitGuru (5) 91.2% 100% 90.9% 59.1% 89.7% - - 109.4% - -
    Lab501 (11) 84.8% 100% - - 92.4% 75.7% - - - -
    LanOC (13) 90.7% 100% - - - 78.7% - - - 99.4%
    NBCheck (14) 88.8% 100% - 67.9% 91.9% - - 92.6% - -
    PCGH (4) 89.3% 100% 88.0% - 86.2% - 83.5% 85.8% - 90.4%
    PCLab (17) 90.2% 100% 88.0% 70.9% 90.2% 76.3% - 93.0% - 94.4%
    PCMag (6) 90.6% 100% 102.4% 76.5% - 89.2% - - - -
    PurePC (11) 91.1% 100% - 72.3% 97.5% - - 105.7% 104.1% 107.8%
    SweClock (8) 91.6% 100% 87.9% 61.3% - - - - 106.8% -
    The FPS (7) 85.0% 100% - 56.5% 83.2% - - - - -
    TPU (30) 88.7% 100% - 75.0% 93.1% 78.5% 86.7% - 92.9% 94.0%
    Tom's (20) 88.9% 100% 92.9% 73.5% 90.6% 76.1% - 87.6% - -
    Tweakers (13) 89.8% 100% - 76.4% 89.4% - - - - 91.1%
    TweakT (8) 90.4% 100% 93.9% - - 75.8% - - - -
    Applic. Average   89.3% 100% 91.6% 68.7% 90.0% 77.0% 89.9% 93.9% 94.5% 97.0%
    List Price   $99 $120 $339 $97 $157 $149 $189 $189 $219 $199
    Retail US   - - EOL $75 $173 $240 EOL $152 EOL $156
    Retail DE   €109 €129 EOL €72 €163 €199 €100 €100 EOL €119

     

    • Ryzen 3 3300X wins 12:1 against the Core i7-7700K and is on average +9% faster, even the Ryzen 3 3100 is nearly on par with the Core i7-7700K
    • Core i5-9400F give you nearly the same performance like the Core i7-7700K, is on par with Ryzen 3 3100 and clearly slower than Ryzen 3 3300X
    • Core i3-9100F & Ryzen 5 3400G are not on the same performance level as the new Ryzen 3
    • Ryzen 5 1600, Ryzen 5 1600 "AF" and Ryzen 5 1600X are between Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X, so the new Ryzen 3 (4C) can beat the low-cost Ryzen 5 (6C)
    • Ryzen 3 3300X even win on average against the Ryzen 5 2600, but some reviews have a different opinion on this case

     

    Gaming Tests 3100 3300X 7700K 9100F 9400F 3400G 1600 1600AF 1600X 2600
    Gen. & Cores   Zen2 4C/8T Zen2 4C/8T KBL 4C/8T CFL 4C/4T CFL 6C/6T Zen+ 4C/8T Zen 6C/12T Zen+ 6C/12T Zen 6C/12T Zen+ 6C/12T
    AnandT (5) 92.8% 100% 101.2% - - - 83.4% - - 91.4%
    CBase (8) 87% 100% 84% 78% 94% 69% - - 73% 76%
    GamersN (5) 79.6% 100% 100.4% 72.1% - 70.0% - 89.5% - -
    Golem (3) 84.6% 100% 91.9% 65.0% - - - 77.9% - -
    KitGuru (5) 83.5% 100% 109.1% 67.9% 103.3% - - 89.7% - -
    PCGH (9) 80.2% 100% 84.9% - 86.3% - 67.9% 78.1% - 76.0%
    PC Per (3) 91.7% 100% 100.9% - - - - - - -
    SweClock (5) 86.9% 100% 99.3% 76.7% - - - - 84.6% -
    Tom's (8) 81.9% 100% 87.7% 76.8% 92.0% 70.3% - 76.6% - -
    Gaming Average   84.2% 100% 92.7% 73.2% 96.1% ~71% ~73% 81.7% ~78% ~83%
    List Price   $99 $120 $339 $97 $157 $149 $189 $189 $219 $199
    Retail US   - - EOL $75 $173 $240 EOL $152 EOL $156
    Retail DE   €109 €129 EOL €72 €163 €199 €100 €100 EOL €119

     

    • the difference between Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300x jumps from +12% at applications to +19% at gaming, showing the impact of the different CCX topology on these SKUs (Ryzen 3 3100: 2 CCX with 2C each, Ryzen 3 3300X: 1 CCX with 4C, 1 CCX disabled)
    • Ryzen 3 3300X still win against Core i7-7700K and Core i5-9400F, but the performance difference to Intel is a bit lower than on application performance and the Core i7-7700K win in a fair share of reviews
    • Ryzen 3 3300X outperform all 1th/2nd gen Ryzen 5 SKUs on gaming with great performance gains (+22% to Ryzen 5 1600 "AF")
    • Ryzen 3 3100 is still good enough to be slightly better than Ryzen 5 1600 "AF" and Ryzen 5 2600 (and clearly better than Ryzen 5 1600 & 1600X)
    • Ryzen 3 3100 is not as fast on gaming as Core i7-7700K or Core i5-9400F, but still (clearly) better than Core i3-9100F

     

    Source: 3DCenter.org

    submitted by /u/Voodoo2-SLi
    [link] [comments]

    [Der8auer] AMD replied! B450 and X470 WILL RECEIVE Support for Zen 3. AMD Statement in Detail

    Posted: 19 May 2020 06:52 AM PDT

    AMD Reverses Course, Will Enable Zen 3 Support on B450 and X470 Motherboards

    Posted: 19 May 2020 07:04 AM PDT

    (GN)Q&A with AMD: Zen 3 on X370, B450 Feature Blocking, DDR5, & Post-Mortem

    Posted: 19 May 2020 04:39 PM PDT

    Raspberry Pi sized Ryzen single board computer. 4c/8c 16gb ddr4 Vega11

    Posted: 19 May 2020 10:34 PM PDT

    AMD to Support Zen 3 and Ryzen 4000 CPUs on B450 and X470 Motherboards

    Posted: 19 May 2020 07:32 AM PDT

    AMD Ryzen 4000 "Vermeer" (Zen3) engineering samples up to 4.6 GHz listed

    Posted: 19 May 2020 04:06 AM PDT

    Ampere Whitepaper now available

    Posted: 19 May 2020 02:23 PM PDT

    CPU gaming performance tested with RAM-OC: Intel Core i9-9900k vs AMD Ryzen 3900x

    Posted: 19 May 2020 03:57 PM PDT

    AMD Backtracks: B450, X470 Motherboards WILL Now Support Zen 3 - HardwareUnboxed

    Posted: 19 May 2020 08:11 AM PDT

    Intel Xe DG1 GPU Tested in OpenCL Benchmarks – Chipzilla’s First Discrete-Tier GPUs For Mobility & Desktop Platforms

    Posted: 20 May 2020 12:51 AM PDT

    Noctua plans to release a "fanless heatsink" later this year

    Posted: 20 May 2020 02:05 AM PDT

    Xilinx ‘Lifts Off’ with Launch of Industry’s First 20nm Space-Grade FPGA for Satellite and Space Applications

    Posted: 20 May 2020 01:59 AM PDT

    Expect a Memory Revolution in 2020—It’s a Big Leap from DDR4 to DDR5 - News

    Posted: 19 May 2020 08:29 AM PDT

    Dell announces AW2521H - 24.5″ 360Hz IPS monitor

    Posted: 19 May 2020 10:46 AM PDT

    Intel's Components Research Group Invents Revolutionary Process and Package Tech [Intel Youtube Channel]

    Posted: 19 May 2020 02:04 PM PDT

    Right to repair and anti-trust - How monopolisation hurts consumers and competition

    Posted: 19 May 2020 10:34 AM PDT

    [igor'sLAB] New details on Ryzen 4000 “Renoir” desktop APUs and Ryzen “Vermeer” CPUs have appeared? The image is getting denser

    Posted: 19 May 2020 03:16 AM PDT

    Why are graphics cards not designed to be upgrade-able ?

    Posted: 20 May 2020 01:53 AM PDT

    Let's say you have been using a 1060ti graphics card that has 4 GB VRAM and a good cooler, instead of buying completely new card, you get a 1080ti GPU and another stick of 4GB of VRAM and you put those on the board just like you would replace the CPU and RAM on the motherboard.

    Are there any technical limitations that prevent this or there simply is no market for it? I know GPUs and VRAM are soldered, could they theoretically use sockets like CPUs and RAM ?

    submitted by /u/RodionRaskoljnikov
    [link] [comments]

    OLED technology timeline

    Posted: 19 May 2020 10:29 AM PDT

    Are VRM daughterboards ever going to make a comeback?

    Posted: 20 May 2020 01:26 AM PDT

    Ran this for 8 years overclocking a 3570K to the edge and dialled slightly back again (4.8Ghz) and I never had to touch my settings again.

    Now I'm on Ryzen and got the mATX half of my 2-system case populated, and the other mobo tray holds ITX. And I really would feel naked with these dinky four-phase VRMs all the AMD motherboards have on ITX...

    Since Threadripper is impossible to put on ITX I would think there would be some high-end ITX boards on AM4 by now, but X370, X470, X570 nothing so far. I guess the AsRock X570 has Thunderbolt which shows they are at least aware but the VRM is not up to scratch. And it only has 1 NVME -.-

    /rant

    submitted by /u/Winterloft
    [link] [comments]

    Linux touchpad: preliminary project funding, survey results

    Posted: 19 May 2020 08:29 AM PDT

    [Gamers Nexus] Thermaltake Level 20 RS Case Review

    Posted: 19 May 2020 09:53 AM PDT

    Probably the best resource on digital sensor tech/properties

    Posted: 19 May 2020 07:36 AM PDT
    Read more
    at

    No comments:

    Post a Comment