Hardware support: At 100TB, the world’s biggest SSD gets an (eye-watering) $40,000 price tag |
- At 100TB, the world’s biggest SSD gets an (eye-watering) $40,000 price tag
- My review of LG 38GL950G-B, a 38" 3860x1600 175hz G-sync Ultrawide Monitor
- [VideoCardz] - Intel Core i7 vPRO 'Rocket Lake-S' CPUs to get 8 cores and 12 (?!) threads
- (GN)Phanteks P500A Case Review: Thermals, Build Quality, & Noise
- [Hardware Scientist] The Best 140mm Fans - for Cases, Heatsinks & Radiators
- Why Haven't 24" 4K Displays and 27" 5k Displays Taken Off Outside of Apple's Ecosystem?
- Chinese CPU-Maker Zhaoxin To Introduce New Discrete GPUs
- [MKBHD] Can you trust MKBHD?
- 2020 Dell XPS 17 9700 facing worrying charging issues, drops from 100 percent to 65 percent battery while “recharging”
- AMD Ryzen Powered Mini PC Has the Potential to Be a NUC Killer
- Meet Zephyr, the mouse with a built-in cooling system
- Bob of all Trades: Nvidia Laptop GPU Problem Explained...From My Point Of View
At 100TB, the world’s biggest SSD gets an (eye-watering) $40,000 price tag Posted: 09 Jul 2020 11:14 AM PDT |
My review of LG 38GL950G-B, a 38" 3860x1600 175hz G-sync Ultrawide Monitor Posted: 09 Jul 2020 07:40 PM PDT SPECIFICATIONSThe LG 38GL950G-B has the following features and specifications:
TLDR;GOOD:
NEUTRAL:
BAD:
DETAILED REVIEW: I am not a professional reviewer but I'm an enthusiast who already had the chance to test a lot of ultra wides so I know what I have to look for. I have used all kind of ultrawides in the past from 2560x1080 60hz to 3440x1440 144hz but this 38" dimension at 175hz is totally new to me. And I will compare the 950G against my AW3420DW which monitor I used for the most of my time and I know everything about. What's in the box ⦁ Metal stand ⦁ Power Cord ⦁ Display Port Cord ⦁ Setup Guide The stand included with the 950G is solid with nice adjustment options. OSD PANEL For the response time of the 950G I refer to the data of tftcentral.
The 2300R of the 950G is more pronounced than other ultrawides I have used previously. At first I thought that the 1900R of my AW3420DW would be perfect, but after using it for some weeks I actually prefer the 2300R of the 950G. I need to mention that this monitor is the best example for a future proof monitor. Even my 2080ti AMP Extreme wasn't able to get anywhere close to the 175hz in actual games beside competetive ones, so this monitor will use the full potential of at least the next two GPU generations. Pretty much my only complaint about the 950G is the massive overshoot in the "fastest" mode, but you can ignore the fact, since you still get impressive response times in the "faster" mode. CONCLUSION The price of the 950G puts it in an interesting place. It is by far above the price of other competitors but also provides the best hardware specs out there and will be future proof for years. I'll close this review with a quote by tftcentral:
[link] [comments] |
[VideoCardz] - Intel Core i7 vPRO 'Rocket Lake-S' CPUs to get 8 cores and 12 (?!) threads Posted: 09 Jul 2020 08:43 AM PDT |
(GN)Phanteks P500A Case Review: Thermals, Build Quality, & Noise Posted: 09 Jul 2020 05:05 PM PDT |
[Hardware Scientist] The Best 140mm Fans - for Cases, Heatsinks & Radiators Posted: 09 Jul 2020 12:29 PM PDT |
Why Haven't 24" 4K Displays and 27" 5k Displays Taken Off Outside of Apple's Ecosystem? Posted: 09 Jul 2020 12:48 PM PDT More or less what it says on the tin, but it is something I've always been curious about. It seems like relatively early on, Apple chose to make their high-DPI desktop displays exclusively use integer scaling, settling on 4K (scaled to resemble 1080p) and 5k (scaled to resemble 1440p) for their desktop displays. As a result, their high-DPI displays are relatively smaller than their non-Apple counterparts--where nearly all other 4k displays are 27" and above, Apple's tend to be 21" to 24". This enables easy, intuitive 2x scaling at apparent resolutions that match their pre-high-DPI counterparts. For whatever reason, the non-Apple PC market has never really adopted this preference, despite the fact that for years I heard nothing but bad things about Windows' non-integer display scaling. I'm sure some of this has to do with the gaming market, which absolutely prefers high refresh rate to high resolution, but there have to be a substantial number of professionals who use non-Apple PCs who would benefit from these sorts of displays. Is there a technical or other reason why they're relatively rare on that side of the fence? [link] [comments] |
Chinese CPU-Maker Zhaoxin To Introduce New Discrete GPUs Posted: 09 Jul 2020 03:23 PM PDT |
Posted: 10 Jul 2020 02:17 AM PDT |
Posted: 10 Jul 2020 01:52 AM PDT |
AMD Ryzen Powered Mini PC Has the Potential to Be a NUC Killer Posted: 09 Jul 2020 11:06 AM PDT |
Meet Zephyr, the mouse with a built-in cooling system Posted: 09 Jul 2020 07:22 AM PDT |
Bob of all Trades: Nvidia Laptop GPU Problem Explained...From My Point Of View Posted: 09 Jul 2020 11:08 PM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from /r/hardware: a technology subreddit for computer hardware news, reviews and discussion.. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment